Defend Arlington’s Official Regulatory Response

Posted on September 5, 2023September 5, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | 1 Comment

The Army’s proposal to remove the Reconciliation Memorial from Arlington National Cemetery violates Congressional mandates in Section 370 of the FY21 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and procedural requirements of both NEPA and the NHPA. The Army’s after-the-fact attempt at compliance with NEPA and NHPA is meaningless as that process will not address the important question the Secretary seeks to avoid, of whether the Memorial should be removed. As discussed in these comments, the Army has neglected to consider the impacts on important historic and cultural resources in its politically charged rush to complete an EIS and complete removal by year’s end. These illegal actions have been challenged in court and the Army must not take any further actions until the validity of these actions is decided.

Part of Defend Arlington's 16 page Regulatory Response

Defend Arlington's Official Regulatory Response

The most awesome thing I have ever read

Arlington National Cemetery, 109 year old Confederate Memorial to the Reconciliation and Reunification of our great nation after our bloodiest war. It was the brainchild of Union soldier and president, William McKinley, who said "every soldier's grave made during our unfortunate civil war is a tribute to American valor." The sculptor, internationally renowned Jewish artist Moses Jacob Ezekiel, was a VMI Confederate soldier. Art critic Michael Robert Patterson states that "no sculptor, as far as known, has ever, in any one memorial told as much history as has Ezekiel in his monument at Arlington; and every human figure in it, as well as every symbol, is in and of itself a work of art." In a barbaric crime against art and history, the naming commission and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin want the monument demolished.

Aerial view of the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery with over 500 graves of Confederate military personnel and some family in concentric circles around the monument. Sculptor Moses Ezekiel is buried with two other Confederate soldiers and one Confederate sailor around the base. The monument is literally their headstone but the naming commission and Secretary Austin want the monument destroyed. Respect for Southern dead is not something they care about despite 44% of today's United States military being recruited in the South.

View from the ground at Arlington National Cemetery of the beautiful Confederate Memorial to the reconciliation of North and South. The Woke naming commission and Secretary Austin want it demolished in the cheapest way possible. Photo courtesy Derrick Johnson.

[Publisher's Note, by Gene Kizer, Jr. - Prepare to experience a HUGE surge of adrenalin and gratification as you read the official 16 page regulatory response filed Friday September 2nd by Defend Arlington. It was largely written by their brilliant attorney.

We can and must win this fight because it is not only the magnificent 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial we are fighting for but the honor and dignity of Arlington National Cemetery itself.

There is no way ANC escapes desecration from Elizabeth Warren and the naming commission's historically fraudulent report if ANC itself becomes a desecrator of American soldier graves, which is EXACTLY what destruction of the Confederate Memorial would make them.

How could it not?

Destruction of the Confederate Memorial would leave 500 graves in concentric circles around Ezekiel's monument, graves that Union soldier and later president, William McKinley, said were ALL tributes to American valor, in the open as freaks to hate and deride.

Imagine Arlington National Cemetery and the U.S. Army doing that to graves in what is supposed to be our nation's most sacred burial ground. The thought is shocking but is more of the Marxist shredding of the fabric of our country that comes from Woke virture-signaling extremists like Elizabeth Warren and the naming commission she spawned with its historically fraudulent report that is politics, not history.

That is an especially stupid thing to do since 44% of our military has traditionally been recruited in the patriotic South, and we are in the middle of a recruiting crisis that is now a national security threat.

Nothing is sacred to Woke extremists like Warren and her naming commission except their leftist politics.

HERE is a PDF of my 13 page regulatory comment submitted last week. It has VALUABLE PDF LINKS such as President Eisenhower's letter on White House letterhead defending Gen. Robert E. Lee, the picture of the handshake across the wall by the old Union and Confederate veterans at Gettysburg's 50th Anniversary, testimony of professional art critics and historians, speeches and pictures from the monument dedication, etc.

More battles are coming but Defend Arlington's brilliant regulatory response makes it clear that we can win this fight, and MUST. Please share it, print it, save it, forward it and use it any way you can.

Make Woke hatred DIE at Arlington National Cemetery.

PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN for our crack legal team. Scroll down for donation links.]

September 2, 2023

Ms. Renea Yates
Director, Office of Army Cemeteries
1 Memorial Avenue
Arlington, VA 22211

Via electronic submission:

Anc-commemorative-works@army.mil

https://www.arlingtoncemetery.mil/About/Confederate-Memorial-Removal

Re: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Initiate Section 106 Public Consultation Regarding Removal of the Confederate Memorial from Arlington National Cemetery 88 Fed. Reg. 51786 (August 4, 2023)

Dear Director Yates:

On behalf of Defend Arlington and the undersigned organizations, we write in strong opposition to the Army’s intent to remove the Confederate Memorial (“Reconciliation Memorial” and “Memorial”) from Arlington National Cemetery (“ANC”). The Army’s proposed actions violate Congressional mandates in Section 370 of the FY21 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and should not be finalized.

Comment Summary

Secretary of Defense Austin’s (“Secretary”), designation of the use of federal military resources occurred on January 4, 2023, when he ordered Army Secretary Wormuth to implement the Naming Commission Recommendations relating to the Memorial constituted final agency action; and that final agency action required review under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”) Section 106.¹ The Secretary seeks to avoid these important procedures by focusing its review on how the removal will occur rather than on whether it should occur at all. If the Secretary had complied with NEPA and NHPA, he would have received important information from his federal advisory committee, members of the military, state historic preservation officers, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (“ACHP”), local governments, historians, academics, and the public about the significance of the Memorial, both historically and culturally, and he would have used that information to inform his decision about whether to implement the recommendation. Importantly, the Secretary would have considered that the recommendation failed to comply with the underlying statutory requirements at 370(g) and (j). Had the Secretary complied with NEPA and NHPA prior to expending federal funds and prior to directing the implementation of the Naming Commission’s recommendations, as required by law, he would have concluded that removal of the Memorial in ANC exceeds his authority, as that recommendation failed to comply with Congressional directives at §370(g) and (j). For these reasons, we believe the Army must not take additional actions to remove the Memorial until the following important legal and procedural requirements are met:

1. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issues a decision in pending litigation,² including any appeal of that decision.

2. The Army extends the public comment period for the proposed EIS, including conducting an additional public scoping meeting, to ensure the purpose and intent of NEPA and the NHPA are met.

3. The Army’s consideration of the Report to the Secretary of the Army from the Federal Advisory Committee on Arlington National Cemetery, and also submission of the Report to the House and Senate Veterans Affairs Committees and House and Senate Armed Services Committees.

4. The Army revises the scope of its EIS and NHPA Section 106 reviews to consider the effects of the Secretary’s order to use federal military resources to remove the Memorial, including the connected actions of determining how and where deconstruction and removal would occur as required by NEPA and NHPA.

Statement of Interest

Defend Arlington ³ is an unincorporated association of individuals and groups that include those dedicated to the preservation of the integrity of Arlington National Cemetery as a National Register Historic Site, particularly as it relates to the planned Orwellian destruction of one of the Cemetery’s most iconic memorials. Defend Arlington members develop resources and educational materials, articles, White Papers, attending and speaking at conferences and other events in furtherance of increasing understanding of the American Military History, and the cultural, artistic and military historic significance of the Reconciliation Memorial.

Defend Arlington is a consulting party in the NHPA Section 106 review. Defend Arlington has requested to be a consulting party in the NHPA Section 106 review.

The Virginia Council, an affiliate of the Common Sense Society, is a citizen's initiative whose mission is the preservation of Virginia History, civil discourse, and the rule of law. We are signatory to this letter because Moses Ezekiel was a preeminent internationally recognized Virginia artist.

Heritage Protection of North Alabama is a citizen’s initiative whose is to prevent destruction and/or relocation of all historical monuments; inform the public about heritage issues; assist in restoration / maintenance of historic sites / monuments / memorials and defend our Southern heritage by challenging those who seek to destroy it. HPNA is a grass-roots organization of concerned citizens across the five counties of the Tennessee Valley in north Alabama. HPNA is particularly concerned about the ANC Reconciliation Memorial because of the extensive connection between the State of Alabama and the Memorial. This not only includes the incorporation of the Alabama Coat of Arms on the Memorial, as well as the numerous Alabamians whose final resting place the Memorial marks, but also the significance of Alabama Senator and 33^rd US. Secretary of the Navy, Hilary A. Herbert, who recommended Sir Moses Ezekiel as the sculptor for the Memorial, and who served in leadership for the Memorial’s erection. HPNA has requested to be a consulting party in the NHPA Section 106 review.

Save Southern Heritage Florida Chapter (SSHFL) is an unincorporated association of individuals whose purpose is to preserve the history of the South for future generations. SSHFL focuses efforts on Florida history. SSHFL has a particular interest in the ANC as the State of Florida is recognized on the Memorial as its coat of arms is incorporated on the Memorial itself, and also in that three Floridians are buried in the Florida section in the concentric circles surrounding the Cenotaph.

SSHFL has requested to be a consulting party in the NHPA Section 106 review.

Military Order of the Stars and Bars, James I Waddell Chapter 32, Raleigh NC – like our namesake, James Iredell Wadell, the last to lower the Stars and Bars, we will be the last to surrender in the battle to honor our American ancestors by preserving the Reconciliation Memorial in its rightful place in America’s outdoor museum of Military History.

Society for the Preservation of Jewish Civil War History (SPJCWH) is an unincorporated group of individuals whose mission is to educate the public on the history of the Jewish people in the War of 1861-1865. The interest in the Reconciliation Memorial is due to the ethnicity of the Jewish artist, Sir Moses Ezekiel, and because of the anti-semitism removal from a United States government cemetery would ignite world-wide. SPJCWH has requested to be a consulting party in the NHPA Section 106 review due to the immense impact on the safety and security of Jews worldwide.

Military Order of the Stars and Bars, North Carolina Chapter – an association dedicated to being First, Foremost, and Farthest in the fight to save the Arlington Reconciliation Memorial just as our ancestors were in battle. The North Carolina coat of arms is represented on the Memorial and 47 known North Carolinian graves are marked by the Memorial.

R.E. Lee Monumental Association - a 501(c)3 nonprofit dedicated to cleaning, restoring, repairing, and managing all monuments in the New Orleans area and south Louisiana since 1989 and is interested in saving the Reconciliation Memorial because all memorials and monuments to American veterans should be honored, respected and preserved. These memorials serve to honor those who gave all, and to educate future generations about important events in American history and Louisiana’s contribution to it, especially the maintenance of the emblem of the State of Louisiana displayed on the Memorial.

Military Order of the Stars and Bars, Major General W H C Whiting Chapter 305, Wilmington NC – is a non-profit entity dedicated to preserving the heritage of its gallant ancestors who fought only for self-determination and continued that fight for America through every war after the War of Northern Conquest. The subject Arlington Memorial is a symbol of reconciliation, a grave marker. and a precious work of art that must be preserved for succeeding generations for its historic importance.

Friends of Judah P. Benjamin (“Friends”) – an unincorporated group of individuals who seek to educate and inform the public about the immense contribution of Jewish Americans in the history of our Nation and particularly in the American South where both Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews alike were feely accepted into Southern society and valued as part of a multi-cultural, diverse society for their unique contributions. Judah P. Benjamin, himself, was the first Jewish member of a Presidential Cabinet, for Confederate President Jefferson Davis, and the first admitted Jew to serve as US Senator when he took office from the State of Louisiana in 1853. The Friends view the planned removal of the Memorial as an attack on Jewish-American history.

Hoods Texas Brigade Association (“HTBA”) – a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation charted under the laws of the State of Texas whose members encourage and foster among the public an understanding of the history of Hood's Texas Brigade and its soldiers; advance historical appreciation for the part that the Brigade played in Texas and Confederate history; organize and sponsor educational activities such as seminars and symposiums about the Brigade. HTBA’s interest in the Memorial is the Texans whose final resting place is marked by the Reconciliation Memorial and the emblem of the State of Texas enshrined in the Memorial.

Guardians of American History, Inc. (GAH) is a non-profit whose mission is to preserve our American History including historical assets pertaining to America and the United States. The mission will be undertaken through education and direct preservation efforts and in collaboration with others with a common purpose to fight back against cancel culture. GAH has requested to be a consulting party in the NHPA Section 106 review.

Detailed Comments

The Proposed Removal Actions Exceed the Secretary’s Authority and Should Not Be Finalized

The Army’s proposed actions violate Congressional mandates in Section 370 of the FY21 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”). The NDAA required consideration of local sensitivities ⁴ and exempted grave markers from consideration for removal.⁵ The Secretary exceeded his authority when he directed the use of existing military resources to initiate the removal action without complying with these clear statutory directives. The Secretary also violated NEPA by failing to consider the environmental impacts and alternatives associated with the decision to deconstruct and remove the Memorial.⁶ Similarly, the Secretary violated the NHPA by failing to consider the impacts on historic and cultural resources prior to directing deconstruction and removal and by failing to provide the ACHP an opportunity to comment on the removal directive.⁷ The Army cannot change the fact that compliance with both NEPA and NHPA must occur prior to a Federal Agency decision and the approval of the expenditure of any Federal funds.⁸ The Army’s after-the-fact attempt at compliance with NEPA and NHPA, announced on August 4, 2023,⁹ is meaningless as that process will not address the triggering federal action. The triggering action was the Secretary’s decision to order the implementation of the Naming Commission’s recommendations which included the removal of the Memorial from Arlington National Cemetery, including the designation of federal funds to undertake the removal action. The Army’s illegal actions and invalid NEPA and NHPA processes have been challenged in litigation pending before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.¹⁰ The Army should not expend any additional military resources until the court determines the validity of the Secretary’s actions.

The Army’s NEPA Process is Fatally Flawed

Even assuming the Army’s NEPA and NHPA actions are legitimate, but they are not. The process is rushed and deliberately designed to limit or completely exclude important voices. First, the Army announced an aggressive schedule for completing preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA.¹¹ The Army intends to prepare a draft Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) within less than thirty days and a final EIS and Record of Decision before the end of 2023, completing the entire process within just a few months. The proposed timeline is unrealistic for such a significant undertaking. By comparison, preparation of an EIS for disposition of historical airport hangars within the Fort Wainright, Alaska, National Landmark, and historical district took three years.¹² The Army’s rushed schedule must be reconsidered and extended to provide sufficient time to ensure an informed agency decision, particularly, where the proposed destruction and removal action would be both expensive and irreversible.

Next, the Army has made significant decisions about Arlington National Cemetery without seeking input of the Congressionally chartered federal advisory committee established for providing advice regarding ANC.¹³ 10 U.S.C. 4723(a) directs “the Secretary of the Army shall establish an advisory committee” and (b) “shall advise and consult with the advisory committee regarding the administration, erection of memorials and master planning of ANC.” The Secretary violated these important mandates by failing to establish an advisory committee for the period of February 2020 to November 2022 and once the committee was established, discouraging it from developing an advisory report regarding the removal. Indeed, on November 8, 2022, after advisory committee members raised concerns with the decision to remove the Memorial. The Department of the Army responded that the decision to remove the Memorial had already been made and that there was no opportunity for the committee’s input to the Secretary.¹⁴ However, we understand that notwithstanding the Army’s discouragement, the Federal Advisory Committee on Arlington National Cemetery (“FACANC”) is preparing a report to the Secretary of the Army.¹⁵ No further action to remove the Memorial should be taken until such time as the findings of the FACANC are considered. In addition, 10 U.S.C. 7723(d) requires that, within 90 days after the report is received, the Secretary of the Army shall submit the report, and any comments or recommendations, to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and House. The Army must comply with these mandates prior to conducting any removal actions in ANC.

Likewise, at the November 8, 2022, FACANC meeting, the Army abruptly determined, without explanation, that members of the public who had registered to speak would no longer be afforded the opportunity. Public input was similarly silenced when several people who had registered to present their views at the Army’s August 23, 2023, virtual public hearing experienced technical problems or were simply not called on to speak. The Army must address these procedural deficiencies prior to taking any further removal actions.

The Draft EIS Must Consider the Following:

1. NEPA § 101(b)(4) states that the Federal Government must use all practicable means to “preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage.” 42 U.S.C. § 4331(b)(4). ANC is the nation’s premier military cemetery and Section 16 and the Memorial play an important role in conveying important aspects of our historic, cultural, and national heritage.¹⁶ The Army must describe the steps it has taken to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 4331(b)(4).

2. NEPA § 102(2)(C) requires federal agencies to evaluate the environmental consequences of their actions and consider any alternatives to proposals for all major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. The Army’s proposed actions will significantly affect the Memorial, Section 16, ANC and its collection and confluence of memorials to fallen American service personnel as ANC developed over time to become a historic district listed on the National Register. The Army must evaluate the environmental consequences of the Secretary’s order to remove the Memorial from ANC and consider any alternatives to the proposed action as required by NEPA. The Army’s NEPA analysis should first focus on the triggering action which was the Secretary’s order directing the use of federal military resources to remove the Memorial.

3. The Army’s EIS scope must include consideration of connected actions. NEPA requires that any connected actions, actions that are closely related to interdependent parts of the larger actions and would not occur without the other actions, must be considered in the same EIS. Decisions about “how and where” the destruction and removal would occur are connected actions under NEPA and must be analyzed as such in the same EIS. 40 CFR 1508.25(a)(1) (i-iii).

4. The Army must conduct a cumulative impact analysis to include a comprehensive review of the remaining cultural resources within ANC that may be threatened for removal on similar grounds, and the impact of potential additional future removal actions on Section 16 and ANC, including any impact on the ability of ANC to retain its listing on the NR as a historic district. 40 CFR 1508.25(a)(2).

5. The Army must conduct an air quality analysis, particularly PM 2.5 and airshed analysis to assess the impact on air quality and increases in criterion pollutants from the operation of heavy equipment, and construction vehicles.

6. The Army must conduct an analysis of the environmental impacts on environmental justice communities, including air, dust, noise, traffic, vibration, and congestion caused by the removal; and a cumulative impact analysis considering existing environmental burden.

7. A work plan must be developed, in coordination with fence line communities, the public, and ANC, taking into consideration impacts on the peace and serenity experience in Section 16 and ANC, interference with burial ceremonies from increased noise, interference with traffic patterns, and increased dust and air emissions during construction.

8. The Army must prepare a detailed budget, including assurances that the work will be conducted by appropriately licensed and trained contractors.

9. A study must be conducted to show that the graves will not incur damage. Verbal assurances are insufficient. The study must, at a minimum, comply with accepted scientific methodology and be cognizant of social and cultural cemetery practices.

10. Viewshed modeling must be conducted to assess the impact of removal on the ANC historic district and the Monument Corridor Viewshed.

11. The Army should consult with each State represented on the Memorial, and whose service personnel will be de-marked by the planned removal.

12. The Army should provide an earnest attempt to contact all the living descendants of those buried in Section 16 and consider the opinions about and the effect of de-marking them.¹⁷

The Proposed Scope of the EIS and NHPA Section 106 Review Must be Revised to Include the Following:

1. The Memorial is Eligible for Listing on the National Register of Historic Places

The Memorial is an extraordinary historic and cultural resource eligible for listing on the National Register. The Army National Military Cemeteries Phase II Intensive level survey evaluated the Memorial and determined it is potentially eligible to be included in the National Register of Historic Places.¹⁸ The survey found the Memorial potentially eligible “because it constitutes a significant physical example of the contested national effort to commemorate the Civil War, and specifically the Confederacy, as part of late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century efforts at reconciliation.”¹⁹ In addition, the survey found the Memorial potentially eligible “for its design by sculptor Moses Ezekiel, a master sculptor whose distinctive work stands out from other Confederate memorials constructed during the same period of significance. It merits listing in the NRHP due to its status as a unique historical artifact that embodies, in monumental form, the discourse surrounding the memorialization of the Civil War.”²⁰ The Memorial is also significant in our nation’s military and cultural history and remains relevant today as a symbol of how America healed its wounds from our own Civil War as described by Jim Webb, U.S. Senator, Navy Secretary and Marine infantry officer in Vietnam.²¹ As such, under NHPA regulations, the Army must identify and evaluate the historic significance of this historic property and determine its eligibility prior to proceeding with removal. 36 CFR 800.4(c).

2. The Memorial as a Contributing Resource to the Arlington National Cemetery Historic District

Arlington National Cemetery, the Nation’s military cemetery, is on the National Register of Historic Places and the Memorial is listed as a contributing resource to the historic significance of ANC.²² ANC is the final resting place for more than 300,000 veterans of every American conflict, from the Revolutionary War to Iraq and Afghanistan. Since its founding in 1864, ANC has provided a solemn place to reflect upon the sacrifices made by the men and women of the United States Armed Forces in the name of our country.²³ The Civil War makes up a critical and defining conflict in our nation’s history, and soldiers who perished on Civil War battlefields are rightly recognized and buried at ANC. Indeed, the ANC was created and founded as a direct result of the Civil War – built on grounds previously owned by and resided on by Mary Custis Lee, her husband General Robert E. Lee, and their family.

3. Section 16 of ANC as Potentially Eligible for Listing on the NRHP and Must be Evaluated.

The Army has failed to include any mention of Section 16 of ANC in conducting the required identification efforts. The Army must make a reasonable and good-faith effort to identify historic resources within the project’s area of potential effects.²⁴ Section 16 contains an area that has been specifically set aside and designated by Congress to re-inter the remains of approximately 260 Confederate soldiers who died in prisoner-of-war camps and in hospitals and battlefields near Arlington.²⁵ After Section 16 was established, the Memorial was erected. Section 16 would continue to be an active burial site for Southern veterans and their spouses into the 1960s. Section 16 has its roots in the early 1900s and came about as an effort by President McKinley, himself a veteran of the Union in the War, and a symbol of reconciliation between the North and South in the post-reconstruction era, and in the post-Spanish American War era. Section 16 was promoted by President McKinley, who also led the effort to re-inter at ANC American service personnel from Cuba who perished on the USS Maine in the lead-up to the Spanish-American War. The mast of the Maine was eventually placed as the focal point of that circular burial site, marking the sailors who perished in the Maine’s sinking. McKinley similarly promoted the establishment of Section 16, which, likewise, originated with re-internments and was later marked with a central marking memorial. These two neighboring twin memorials stand together in the history of ANC and launched a plan to commemorate casualties of significant American sacrifices that continues to today. As such, the Army must evaluate Section 16 under criteria set forth in National Park Service regulations at 36 CFR Part 60, (a)-(d). At a minimum, the Army should evaluate the degree to which Section 16 meets criteria (a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; and (b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. We believe Section 16 is individually eligible under these criteria for listing on the NRHP. The Army may not move forward with the removal of the Memorial until these important eligibility decisions are made. In addition, eligible or not, the Army must consider the impacts, both direct and indirect, of the removal of the Memorial on the integrity of Section 16.

4. The Memorial as a Contributing Resource to a Broader Monument Core

This memorial is part of the Washington Monumental Corridor Master Plan.²⁶ The Monumental Corridor was part of the “American Renaissance” and North-South linkage promoted by renowned architects McMillan and Olmstead. They envisioned a “city beautiful” plan for Washington, DC that extended over the Potomac River into Virginia to Arlington House and the Cemetery. The bridge was to become a symbolic link between North and South from DC to Arlington and the addition of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, punctuated with monuments and memorials evidenced this American Renaissance, and to demonstrate to the world American unification. This beaux-arts style memorial is the most significant monumental artwork at Arlington, and part of the American Renaissance which ignited a movement to build monumental art around the country. The entire Monumental Corridor, the Viewshed from Mount Vernon through to the Capitol, must be included in the EIS study area and the NHPA Area of Potential Effects (“APE”), as they are part of the master plan and significant in the north-south reunification and the American Renaissance. The APE must be expanded to include the entire Viewshed of the Washington Monumental core.

5. The Memorial Site as Eligible for Consideration as a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Site

The Memorial is significant to Canada and other nations and is potentially eligible to be a UNSECO World Heritage Site. One of the graves in the plot marked by the Memorial is of a Canadian citizen, Jerry Cronan, who was killed at the Battle of Spotsylvania. There were many more citizens of other nations who perished in service to one of the states represented on the Memorial. These other nations need to be identified and consulted as they are being impacted as well. Because of its significance in American history, Arlington House and the Arlington National Cemetery are eligible for listing as a UNESCO World Heritage site.

6. The Memorial as Significant to the Descendants of the Buried

There are over 500 soldiers and widows whose remains are interred in concentric circles at the Memorial, which marks the site of their burials. Some of the remains were relocated in Section 16 from other sections of Arlington, others from POW camps nearby before the Memorial was erected. However, after the Memorial was erected, others chose to be buried there, undoubtedly because of the new Memorial. The Army must make a sincere effort to contact the descendants of the buried dead and seek their views.

7. The Memorial as a Grave Marker

The Memorial is a grave marker for Moses Ezekiel. Unveiled in 1914 and dedicated by President Woodrow Wilson, the Memorial was designed by noted American sculptor Moses Jacob Ezekiel, a Confederate veteran and the first Jewish graduate of Virginia Military Institute, to mark Section 16. Ezekiel originally named the Memorial the New South Memorial. It is also commonly referred to as the Reconciliation Memorial. Ezekiel was buried at the base of his creation in 1921. It was Ezekiel’s request to be buried at the base of the Memorial in Section 16 of Arlington—laid to rest inches from the base of his Memorial without the traditional approved white marble headstone authorized for use in Arlington. Three other service personnel and spouses are interred inches from the base of the Memorial: Lt. Harry C. Marmaduke, Capt. John M. Hickey, and Brig. Gen. Marcus J. Wright. The graves of the approximately 500 Southern service personnel and their spouses are arranged in concentric circles around the Memorial and its abutting graves. The fact that the Memorial is a grave marker precludes its removal. In NDAA § 370(j), Congress explicitly exempted grave markers from the Naming Commission’s consideration for renaming or removal. Congress delegated to the Naming Commission the definition of Grave Marker, i.e. “Markers located at the remains of the fallen”. As the Memorial is inches not only from Ezekiel’s grave, but also marks the entire plot of graves, the Memorial meets the Naming Commission’s definition of a Grave Marker, and so this removal is outside the scope of the NDAA and the Naming Commission’s remit.²⁷

The NHPA Section 106 Review Must Consider the Following:

NHPA § 106 requires Federal agencies with jurisdiction over Federal undertakings, prior to the approval of the expenditure of any Federal funds, shall consider the effect of the undertaking on any historic property and provide the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation an opportunity to comment.²⁸ The Secretary’s directive to implement the Commission’s removal recommendation is a Federal undertaking.²⁹ Any site that is included in the National Register is considered historic property.³⁰ The Arlington National Cemetery is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The entirety of the cemetery is counted as one contributing site, and every resource except the small-scale features within the boundaries is contributing to the ANC Historic District. The Memorial is listed as a contributing resource to the historic significance of ANC. The Army must consider the adverse effects that removal of the Memorial will have on the integrity of the Arlington National Cemetery as our nation’s military cemetery. In addition, as stated previously, the Memorial itself and Section 16 are potentially individually eligible for listing and must be evaluated under the National Park Service criteria prior to any removal actions.

NHPA compliance requires the agency to proceed through specific steps in consultation with SHPOs, consulting parties and the public to first identify historic properties potentially affected by the removal, assess the effects, and seek ways to minimize or mitigate any unavoidable adverse effects. Failure to proceed consistent with these regulatory requirements is a violation of the statute.³¹

The Advisory Council’s NHPA implementation guidance recommends that each step of the Section 106 process must be completed prior to moving to the next step.³²

As stated previously, the Army has not completed a reasonable, good-faith effort to identify important historic and cultural resources, including whether the Memorial and Section 16 are individually eligible. The Army has also neglected to include the Washington Monument Core district in the scope of review.

Furthermore, The Army is violating the NHPA by seeking public input on mitigation measures prior to completing the following regulatory requirements:

Identifying the proper scope of review (36 CFR 800.4),
Identifying historic properties (36 CFR 800.4(b)),
Evaluating historic significance under the National Register criteria (36 CFR Part 63),
Determining whether a property is eligible for listing on the National Register (36 CFR 800.4(c)(2)),
Notifying consulting parties that there are historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking and invite their views (36 CFR 800.4(d)(2)),
Applying criteria of adverse effect (36 CFR 800.5)(d)(2)).

Only after completing all these steps in consultation with SHPOs and other consulting parties, is it appropriate for the Army to seek input on resolving adverse effects, including modifications or alternatives to avoid, minimize or mitigate.³³Without completing this important information gathering and consultation requirements, the Army has not provided the public with the information necessary to engage in a meaningful discussion of mitigation.

Recommendations:

Scope of Review

The Army must determine an appropriate scope of review, defined as the Area of Potential Effects (APE).
The APE must include the entire Viewshed, as the Memorial is an important contributing element in the ANC historic district and the Washington Monumental Core that extends from the Washington Monument across the Memorial Bridge to ANC, including Section 16 and the Memorial around which Section 16 was built.
Aerial and visual impact modeling must be completed to analyze impacts.

Identification of Adverse Effects

The Army must develop information on the direct, indirect, and cumulative adverse effects of the removal action, including the following:

Physical destruction of the Memorial from removal and relocation or destruction of the bronze elements - a study must be conducted.
Change in character of Section 16 caused by the removal action.
Transfer out of federal control without adequate preservation restrictions.
The cultural impact of removal on those States that are represented in the Memorial and whose service personnel are marked by the Memorial or who were citizens of such State.
The cultural and emotional impact of removal on the descendants of those interred in Section 16.
Viewshed impacts.
Impact on ANC historic district from removal of the Memorial, a known contributing element to the district’s significance.

Resolving Adverse Effects

The Army must consider alternatives for avoidance, minimization, and mitigation of adverse effects:

There is no adequate mitigation:

o The Memorial represents a significant historic work of art.

o The Memorial was commissioned; and designed by the artist for; display at the designated site, marking the graves in Section 16.

o No alternative location is suitable. ANC is the Nation’s Most Sacred Shrine and a historic district on the National Register of Historic Places. The Memorial has been determined to be a contributing element to the historic district. Removal would have a devastating impact on Section 16 and the district.

o The Reconciliation Memorial is a focal point for the graves interred in Section 16. The mortal remains of American service personnel and wives, including the Memorial’s creator, are located under the Memorial. The FY21 NDAA clearly stated the Naming Commission’s objectives were to preclude grave markers; yet the Reconciliation Memorial is central to the design of Section 16, and removal will leave over 400 gravestones facing an empty slab without interpretation.

o Arlington National Cemetery, as a National Register Historic District, is an outdoor museum dedicated to American military sacrifice and a display of the respect that Americans show for that sacrifice. Removal of the Memorial will extricate and suppress from Arlington the complete historical timeline and story told through the sequence of memorial monuments at Arlington and will diminish the respect and significance of this important historic site.

o Any proposal to move the Memorial must be codified, after providing for public notice and comment, in an enforceable Memorandum of Agreement with the consulting parties prior to taking any actions that would adversely affect the Memorial or the ANC historic district in which it is located.

Attachments

In addition to this document, we submit the following that address the inability to mitigate the removal of the Memorial, as well as the Area of Potential Effect, and the environmental and cultural impacts of removal:

“Save the Confederate Memorial at Arlington”, Wall Street Journal August 18, 2023, by Senator Jim Webb and

Arguments Against Naming Commission Recommendation Re: Arlington National Cemetery Confederate Memorial: A collection of White Papers, articles, testimony, and the Presidential Monument dedication speech.

Conclusion

Respectfully submitted,

s/Vincent Balducci
Defend Arlington

s/Dr. Ann McLean
The Virginia Council, an affiliate of the Common Sense Society

s/Lt. Col. Edwin Kennedy, US Army, Retired
Heritage Protection of North Alabama

s/James Shillinglaw, US Navy, Retired
Save Southern Heritage Florida Chapter

s/Commander
Military Order of the Stars and Bars, James I. Waddell Chapter

s/ Lunelle Siegel
Society for the Preservation of Jewish Civil History

s/Howard Talley, III
Military Order of the Stars and Bars, North Carolina Society

s/Geary Mason
RE Lee Monumental Association

s/H.K. Edgerton
Veterans Defending Arlington

s/Commander
Military Order of the Stars and Bars, Major General W.H.C. Whiting Chapter 305

s/Glenn Carroll, President
Hood’s Texas Brigade Association

s/David R. McCallister
Friends of Judah P. Benjamin

s/MJ Stephens
Guardians of American History, Inc.

Links to Important Resources

Defend Arlington Fundraising Site where you can help save Moses Ezekiel's MAGNIFICENT 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery by Buying Outstanding Merchandise featuring BEAUTIFUL images from the monument. Art critics have said that every image on the monument is a work of art by itself. There are all kind of things like shirts, hats, hoodies, clocks, art prints, tote bags, note cards, stickers, ipad skins and cases, cell phone cases and skins, wall art, coasters, mugs, pins, throw pillows, water bottles, journals, magnets, etc.! ALL PROCEEDS GO TO THE DEFENSE FUND! Go spend some time on this site! You will love it!

Shop Now

Defend Arlington's recording of the 35 or so speakers on behalf of the Confederate Memorial at Arlington National Cemetery that took place Wednesday, March 15, 2023 in a virtual meeting of the Remember and Explore Subcommittee of Arlington National Cemetery.

View testimony which starts at 1:38:59.

Here is a link to Defend Arlington's donation page that states:

CHIP IN FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY MEMORIAL LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND. You can also pay with Zelle. Send to

DefendArlington@gmail.com.

Please Donate Now -- THANK YOU!

Click Here to Donate AND Share on Facebook, et al.

Defend Arlington update with link to February 28, 2023 Tucker Carlson interview with Christopher Bedford on the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington update, Tucker Carlson segment on YouTube

Hot off the press! Here is a link to the new 385 page PDF from Defend Arlington that flips pages as you read. It contains all the great scholarly white papers gathered up by Defend Arlington to make sure that Woke ignorance DIES at Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington's 385 Page Book of White Papers

Here is a link to an informative nine minute video, "The Arlington Confederate Monument," produced by the Abbeville Institute.

The Arlington Confederate Monument

Here is a link to the outstanding scholarly PDF white papers written for Defend Arlington. You can download them all with one click. Please share them far and wide, especially the letter from Defend Arlington's attorney, Karen C. Bennett, to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin.

PDF White Papers from Defend Arlington

Here is link to an excellent video refuting point by point a historically false Prager University video by Ty Seidule, who is naming commission vice chair. This one is produced by Bode Lang and entitled "The Civil War Was Not for Slavery."

Click Here for Bode Lang's excellent video

Here is a link to an excellent video of a Georgia lady calling out Elizabeth Warren and her Massachusetts hypocrisy.

Click Here for Georgia Lady Teaching Elizabeth Warren a Lesson

Here are important Southern Legal Resource Center links. SLRC mailing address is: Southern Legal Resource Center, 90 Church St., Black Mountain, NC 28711-3365.

Click Here to donate to the Southern Legal Resource Center

Click Here to follow on Facebook

Click Here to go to their website

NOTES:

¹ 42 U.S.C. § 4332 (2)(C) and 54 U.S.C. § 306108.

² See Hudson, et al. v. United States Dep’t of Defense, USDC DC; Case No:1:23-cv-02094;

Defend Arlington c/o Save Southern Heritage Florida, et al. v. United States Dep’t of Defense et al., USDC DC, Case No. 1:23-CV-00441.

³ Signatories Defend Arlington and Save Southern Heritage Florida and their members are Plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed February 16, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, CV No. 23-CV-441 challenging the Secretary of Defense’s, and the Secretary of the Army’s illegal actions under the Administrative Procedures Act, NEPA and NHPA.

⁴ Pub. L. No. 116-283, §370(g).

⁵ Id. at §370(j).

⁶ NEPA § 102(2) requires federal agencies to evaluate the environmental consequences of their actions and consider any alternatives to proposals for all major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. 42 U.S.C. § 4332 (2)(C).

⁷ NHPA § 106 requires Federal agencies with jurisdiction over Federal undertakings, prior to the approval of the expenditure of any Federal funds, shall consider the effect of the undertaking on any historic property and provide the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation an opportunity to comment. 54 U.S.C. § 306108.

⁸ See Lee v. Thornburgh, 877 F.2d 1053, 1056 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (NHPA applies prior to approving the expenditure of funds).

⁹ 88 Fed. Reg. 51786 (Aug. 4, 2023).

¹⁰ Hudson, et al. v. United States Dep’t of Defense, USDC DC; Case No:1:23-cv-02094; Defend Arlington c/o Save Southern Heritage Florida, et al. v. United States Dep’t of Defense et al., USDC DC, Case No. 1:23-CV-00441

¹¹ See Arlington National Cemetery - Home (arlingtoncemetery.mil)(announcing August 23, 2023 Public Meeting announcing a draft EIS would be completed in September, just shortly after the September 2, 2023 close of the scoping public comment period to discuss mitigation of adverse impacts of removal of Confederate Memorial).

¹² Disposition_of_Hangars_2_and_3_FinalEIS.pdf

¹³ Established pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 4723, and in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended) and 41 C.F.R. Section 102-3.50(a).

¹⁴ Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Arlington National Cemetery, Nov. 7-8, 2023, meeting minutes available at: ACANC Meetings (arlingtoncemetery.mil).

¹⁵ Meeting of the Remember and Explore Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee on Arlington National Cemetery, August 11, 2023.

¹⁶ See Senator Jim Webb, Save the Confederate Memorial at Arlington, Wall Street Journal, August 18, 2023.

¹⁷ 40 CFR §1508.25(a)(2).

¹⁸ See Phase II Intensive-Level Survey of the Confederate Memorial (000-1235) SHR File No. 2022-0201, March 20, 2023 available at: ConfederateMemorial-Phase II Survey Report- 230803-DHR 2022-0201_1.pdf (arlingtoncemetery.mil).

¹⁹ Id. at pg. 1.

²⁰ Id.

²¹ See Webb, Wall Street Journal, Aug. 18, 2023.

²² Id. (In 2014, the Confederate Memorial had been listed as a contributing resource to the Arlington National Cemetery Historic District (000-0042).

²³ See U.S. Dept. of the Interior, National Register of Historic Places (https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/000-

0042_ArlingtonNationalCemetery_2014_NRHP_nomination_FINAL_complete.pdf.)

²⁴ 36 CFR §800.4(b)(1).

²⁵ See Nat’l Park Service, Arlington National Cemetery, Arlington

(https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/national_cemeteries/virginia/arlington_national_cemetery.h tml).

²⁶ See FrameworkPlan1_Intro.pdf (ncpc.gov).

²⁷ The Naming Commission Final Report to Congress; Part III: Renaming Department of Defense Assets.

²⁸ 54 U.S.C. § 306108.

²⁹ 36 CFR §800.16(y).

³⁰ 54 U.S.C. § 300308.

³¹ See 36 CFR Part 800 procedures for how Federal agencies meet these statutory responsibilities.

³² See CitizenGuideSmallSizeFinal4Web.indd (achp.gov).

³³ 36 CFR §800.6

Naming commission’s report on the Confederate Memorial is a historical FRAUD

Posted on August 29, 2023August 29, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | 5 Comments

Ezekiel . . . accepted the verdict of the civil war's arbitrament with all the fine generosity that has been characteristic of both the north and south; and the splendid product of his art, that here testifies to our nation's reunion, will stand from this day forth as guardian over his ashes. . . . Every line and curve and expression carries the plea for a truly united nation that may be equal to the burdens of these exacting times. It speaks to us the ardent wish, the untiring purpose, to help make our people one people . . . It is the memorial of reunited America, the testimony to the tradition of indissoluble union, the shrine to which we are gathered today, and will gather through the years to come . . .

Excerpts from President Warren G. Harding's message read at the funeral of Moses Ezekiel, sculptor of the Arlington Confederate Memorial

Naming commission's report on the Confederate Memorial is a historical FRAUD

It is Woke extremist politics that began with Elizabeth Warren during the George Floyd riots

As Brigadier General Joseph S. Stringham (ret) said, the naming commission's report is WITHOUT VERIFICATION

The Confederate Memorial is NOT in the naming commission's remit as they falsely claim

THE PUBLIC CAN MAKE COMMENTS until September 2, 2023, at 11:59 p.m. EST (there is a link below to the comment page); KEY POINTS from Defend Arlington are below and available as PDF

[Publisher's Note, by Gene Kizer, Jr. - As stated earlier, before Elizabeth Warren and her Woke naming commission can desecrate Arlington National Cemetery by demolishing the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial, they must follow the Section 106 process required by the National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.

It is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to leave comments before the September 2, 2023, at 11:59 p.m. EST deadline for this round, and it is easy to do so.

Just click HERE and start writing though I would advise reviewing the points and articles below and outlining your argument beforehand. You can also email your comments to: anc-commemorative-works@army.mil. Click HERE for PDF of Defend Arlington Key Points, or scroll down.

Click HERE to see the video of the August 23, 2023 public Zoom meeting of Arlington National Cemetery in which approximately 100 people supported the Confederate Memorial versus one who wanted it down. Supporters' commentary is powerful and often emotional. You can skip forward past the introduction and go straight to public comments.

Click HERE to view 28 official United States Army photographs of the magnificent Confederate Memorial. Looking at these stunning photographs for one second shows you clearly that destruction of this monument is a barbaric, uncivilized act that only an extremist like leftist vice chair of the naming commission, Ty Seidule, could be in favor of.

Seidule hates the Confederate Memorial, and the reconciliation of North and South after the bloody war, and said so in his screed, Robert E. Lee and Me (below).

The Confederate Memorial is NOT in the naming commission's remit, as they falsely claim, nor did Congress specifically mandate its removal.

The naming commission's unverified report deliberately leaves out the reconciliation theme, though that theme is IRREFUTABLE and stated repeatedly in Arlington National Cemetery's own application for its Historic District to be on the National Register of Historic Places. (download my PDF white paper "The Reconciliation of North and South After the War Between the States as Symbolized by the Confederate Memorial 'New South' in Arlington National Cemetery")

The Confederate Memorial symbolizes peace, patriotism and the reunification of the United States of America. It does not commemorate the Confederacy.

The Confederate Memorial is one of the most significant monuments on earth, not only for its symbolism of reconciliation after a war in which 750,000 died and over a million were maimed, but because of its magnificence. Again, look at the Army Photographs and ask yourself what kind of person would want to destroy a monument like that?

Click HERE to view a United States Army video of the Confederate Memorial.

Art critic Michael Robert Patterson states that:

. . . no sculptor, as far as known, has ever, in any one memorial told as much history as has Ezekiel in his monument at Arlington; and every human figure in it, as well as every symbol, is in and of itself a work of art.

Esteemed British art critic and historian, Alexander Adams, writes in his "Testimony regarding Arlington National Cemetery Confederate Memorial submitted to the Advisory Committee on Arlington National Cemetery Open Session," 7-8 November, 2022 (download PDF):

Having viewed a large amount of public statuary from the beaux-arts era (1850-1914), it is my professional opinion that the Memorial is a serious, iconographically complex and technically accomplished piece of art. In my view, it is a handsome sculpture and an entirely appropriate funerary monument. I consider it an internationally significant piece of art of its type and era. Any nation should be proud to host such a magnanimous and dignified monument.
The inscription “And they shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning hooks” provides a Biblical guidance to turning from war to peace. This is echoed by the personification of the South, which holds the wreath of glory and touches the plough of peaceful prosperity. The frieze below depicts the contributions of those who supported the war effort.

Here is some of the massive amount of history that the naming commission left out of their fraudulent report:

The monument was the idea of Union soldier and later president, William McKinley, after enthusiastic Southern participation in the Spanish-American War, and it was approved by Congress.

McKinley said:

. . . every soldier's grave made during our unfortunate civil war is a tribute to American valor . . . And the time has now come . . . when in the spirit of fraternity we should share in the care of the graves of the Confederate soldiers . . . The cordial feeling now happily existing between the North and South prompts this gracious act and if it needed further justification it is found in the gallant loyalty to the Union and the flag so conspicuously shown in this year just passed by the sons and grandsons of those heroic dead.

President William Howard Taft spoke and was warmly received at the UDC ceremony the evening the cornerstone was laid.

President Woodrow Wilson (download PDF photograph) gave the dedication speech June 4, 1914 (download Wilson's address).

President Theodore Roosevelt sent the first memorial wreath that started an annual tradition observed by all presidents including Barack Obama.

President Warren G. Harding sent a message of condolence (download PDF here) that was read at the funeral of the monument's acclaimed Jewish sculptor, Moses Ezekiel, who was a VMI Confederate soldier. Here are some of Harding's comments from The Evening Star, Washington, D.C., Wednesday, March 30, 1921:

'Ezekiel will be remembered,' the President wrote, 'as one who knew how to translate the glories of his own time and people into that language of art which is common to all peoples and all times. He served his state in the conflict that threatened to divide and that at last served to unify our country. He accepted the verdict of the civil war's arbitrament with all the fine generosity that has been characteristic of both the north and south; and the splendid product of his art, that here testifies to our nation's reunion, will stand from this day forth as guardian over his ashes.
'Every line and curve and expression carries the plea for a truly united nation that may be equal to the burdens of these exacting times. It speaks to us the ardent wish, the untiring purpose, to help make our people one people, secure in independence, dedicated to freedom, and ever ready to lend the hand of confident strength in aid of the oppressed and needy. Its long-drawn shadows of earliest morn and latest evening will always fall on sacred soil. The genius that produced, the love that gave, the devotion that will cherish it will forever be numbered among our ennobling possessions.
'[H]e wrought them into works which compelled the recognition of the chief art schools and won the honors of nations and cities that boasted of being the homes of sculpture's best traditions. Crowned with these honors, he turned his thoughts to his own country, and as the final and finest product of his talents gave to us the monument that from this day will mark his resting place. It is the memorial of reunited America the testimony to the tradition of indissoluble union, the shrine to which we are gathered today, and will gather through the years to come, those who would dedicate themselves to the ideal of unselfish, enlightened, upstanding Americanism as a force for our country's maintenance and all humanity's betterment.'

You can not read President Harding's message without knowing that the Confederate Memorial represents RECONCILIATION, peace, love and patriotism, all things the naming commission left out of its fraudulent, unverified report.

Ezekiel created the Confederate Memorial in the City of Rome, Italy and is buried next to his monument along with two other Confederate soldiers and a Confederate sailor, which makes the monument their grave marker as President Harding stated in his funeral message.

Grave markers are prohibited, in Warren's legislation, from being destroyed. Destruction of the Confederate Memorial is ILLEGAL.

Veterans North and South, with love and enthusiasm for our reunited nation, supported the Confederate Memorial and spoke at its ceremonies. (See PDF photo of Gen. Bennett H. Young, commander, United Confederate Veterans, and PDF photo of Gen. Washington Gardner, commander, Grand Army of the Republic).

Although the naming commission falsely claimed "contextualization was not an appropriate option," a hundred page book of all the participants, speeches and history was published in 1914 by the UDC and is available on Amazon today. The title is: History of the Arlington Confederate Monument, by Hilary A. Herbert, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Arlington Confederate Monument Association. It is available in hardback or softcover. Click HERE for PDF.

The Confederate Memorial could easily be contextualized, which is why the Advisory Committee on Arlington National Cemetery itself asked in a meeting earlier this year, why their own people could not just give the history of the monument rather than destroy it.

The Confederate Memorial was constructed during the days of the 50th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg and the famous handshakes across the wall (click for PDF photo) by the old Union and Confederate veterans.

The naming commission is a Woke political commission. They are not interested in historical truth. They are interested in extremist leftist politics, which is why this legislation was put forth in the first place by Elizabeth Warren, America's most famous fake Indian.

Naming commission vice chair, Ty Seidule, who hates the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery, himself admits the reconciliation theme and wrote about it in his book, Robert E. Lee and Me, though he left that out of the naming commission's report.

I doubt if Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin would have approved demolishing a magnificent 109 year old monument to peace and reconciliation in our nation's most sacred burial ground if he had been given the complete history.

On page 162 of Robert E. Lee and Me, Seidule writes:

Of the thousands of monuments around the country to the Confederacy, the one in Arlington National Cemetery angers me the most. Every year, the commander in chief sends a wreath, ensuring the Confederate monument receives all the prestige of the U.S. government. That's why it riles me so much. . . .¹

Seidule then admits that the Confederate Memorial stands for reconciliation, and he, himself, regrets that:

I know both political parties and white citizens in the North and South brought the country back together after the tremendous bloodletting and destruction of the Civil War. The posts named for Confederate officers during World War I also served to knit white America back together as it fought a common foe. And it worked, but we must recognize that reconciliation came at a steep and horrifying cost. African Americans paid the price with lynching, Jim Crow segregation, and the loss of the franchise. The price for white reconciliation remains far too high. (Bold emphasis added.)²

Truth is, none of the Army base names should have been changed, because, as Seidule himself admits, they were named after Confederates as part of the reconciliation of the United States of America, not to commemorate the Confederacy.

Seidule and Elizabeth Warren have aptly shown us how history can be falsified and destroyed for political purposes as George Orwell warned about when he said: "Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past."

Seidule is incredibly ignorant of history. The "Jim Crow segregation" he mentioned, started in the North and was there a long time before moving South, according to C. Vann Woodward in The Strange Career of Jim Crow.

The Old South was an integrated society unlike the Old North, which was a white supremacist, rigidly segregated society. Several Northern states including Lincoln's Illinois had laws forbidding blacks from even visiting, must less living there. Blacks visiting more than a few days in Illinois could be whipped and jailed.

Alexis de Tocqueville in Democracy in America said race prejudice was strongest in New England and places that had never known blacks except as cargo.

New Englanders brought all the slaves here for profit and they did not want blacks near them in the North or West.

So, the naming commission and its vice chair definitely knew the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery symbolized reconciliation and the reunification of the United States of America but they did not say a word about it.

That glaring omission makes their report, with respect to the Confederate Memorial, a lie and a complete historical fraud.³

Another HUGE thing to bring out in comments is the desecration of the 518 Confederate graves that are in concentric circles around the Confederate Monument. Those graves, that President William McKinley said are all tributes to American valor, are an INTEGRAL part of the Confederate Memorial. With no monument, those graves will surround a mangled shaft and be the objects of hate and derision, like freaks, in our nation's most sacred burial ground.

The message, as Seidule said in Robert E. Lee and Me, is that reconciliation was a mistake, but thanks to him, reconciliation is now over. No wonder the Army can't recruit.

Seidule says all the time that Southerners are descended from traitors but see the PDF of President Dwight D. Eisenhower's letter on presidential letterhead defending the picture of Robert E. Lee he kept on his White House wall the whole time he was president.

Eisenhower says it well, that the issues of States Rights versus supreme federal power, the right of secession, etc. were not settled before the War Between the States, and good men and women, North and South, had legitimate disagreement.

An ocean of Southern blood has been shed across the globe in defense of our great nation since reconciliation because 44% of our military has traditionally come from the South.

Yet, today, our military can't recruit because of Seidule and Warren's type of Woke politics.

Demolishing the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial would make Arlington National Cemetery a purveyor of hate and division, and a desecrator of soldier graves in what is supposed to be our country's most sacred burial ground.

We can not allow that to happen.

HERE (PDF) and below is a list of key points put out by Defend Arlington to consider in your comments.

HERE is a PDF of Defend Arlington's comprehensive white paper book with 17 articles from distinguished individuals and scholars. It is entitled Arguments Against Naming Commission Recommendation, RE: Arlington National Cemetery Confederate Memorial, A collection of white papers, articles, testimony, and the Presidential Monument dedication speech.

HERE is a PDF of former Virginia senator and Navy secretary, Jim Webb's, commanding Wall Street Journal article, "Save the Confederate Memorial at Arlington," published Saturday, August 19, 2023. Webb was a Marine infantry officer in Vietnam and is a distinguished fellow at Notre Dame's International Security Center. Here are some excerpts:

Having spent four years as a full committee counsel in the House and six years as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, I cannot imagine that the removal of this memorial, conceived and built with the sole purpose of healing the wounds of the Civil War and restoring national harmony, could be within the intent of a sweeping sentence placed inside a nearly trillion-dollar piece of legislation.
The larger and ultimate question reaches further into America’s atrophied understanding of the Civil War itself. What was it that Union Army veteran McKinley [who was later president and conceived the idea for the Confederate Memorial in Arlington] understood about the Confederate soldiers who opposed his infantry units on the battlefield that eludes today’s monument smashers and ad hominem destroyers of historical reputations?
McKinley’s fellow soldiers understood that during the Civil War, four slave states remained in the Union—Maryland, Delaware, Missouri and Kentucky—and none of them were required to give up slavery during the entire war. And that in every major battle of the Civil War, slave owners in the Union Army fought against non-slave-owners in the Confederate Army. They understood that President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation did not free the slaves in those states or in the areas of the South that had already been conquered. The proclamation freed only slaves in the areas taken after it was issued. And in the eyes of a Confederate soldier, if Lincoln had not freed slaves in the union, why should the soldier be vilified for supposedly fighting on behalf of slavery?
Many soldiers in the North, and many more in the South, would have understood what John Hope Franklin (1915-2009), America’s most esteemed black historian, pointed out: In 1860 only 5% of whites in the South owned slaves, and less than 25% of whites benefited economically from slavery. An estimated 258,000 Confederate soldiers died in the war, about a third of all those who fought for the South. Few owned slaves. So why did they fight?
The soldier who wrote the inscription on the Confederate Memorial knew. And so did President McKinley and most veterans who have fought in America’s wars.

Click HERE for a PDF of the "Consulting Party Response Form for the Section 106 Review Process" that will allow you to be kept informed and to be given opportunities to input your thoughts over the next two months.

Southern valor in the War Between the States is unmatched in the history of the world. Historian James McPherson writes:

the overall mortality rate for the South exceeded that of any country in World War I and that of all but the region between the Rhine and the Volga in World War II.⁴

The funerary urns on the Confederate Memorial represent those losses from each year of the war.

The descendants of those good Americans, encouraged by men like Robert E. Lee, Nathan Bedford Forrest and so many others, rejoined our great nation with enthusiasm and have been the best Americans ever since.

We can not allow an extremist political commission with a historically fraudulent report to destroy a magnificent memorial unique in the history of the world in our nation's most sacred burial ground.

Stand up and FIGHT!

Please COMMENT and donate money (scroll down).]

Defend Arlington KEY POINTS in the fight to save the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery

1. REMOVAL ILLEGAL / UNCONSTITUTIONAL

a) Removing the Memorial is illegal because it is a grave marker - the enabling Legislation excluded grave markers

The Secretary of Defense exceeded his authority by adopting a recommendation that is specifically prohibited in the 2021 NDAA that prohibits inclusion of grave markers (Section 370 (j). The Memorial marks the grave of Jewish artist and American veteran Sir Moses Ezekiel. This cenotaph even meets the Naming Commission’s own definition of a grave marker. The 3rd report to congress states “Markers located at the remains of the fallen. A marker, headstone, foot stone, niche cover, or flat marker containing inscriptions commemorating one or more decedents interred at that location.” This definition aligns with 38 U.S. Code § 2306 – Headstones, markers, and burial receptacles” US President Warren G. Harding sent a letter to be read at Ezekiel's funeral at Arlington. The Evening Star (Washington D.C.) published a full quotation on March 30th, 1921. Here is a small part of it:

. . . he turned his thoughts to his own country, and as the final and finest product of his talents gave to us the monument that from this day will mark his resting place. It is a memorial of a reunited America, the testimony to the tradition of an indissoluble union, the shrine to which are gathered today.

This removal is illegal.

b) Removing the Memorial is illegal - The Army ignored the enabling Legislation that required it to consider local sensitivities.

The Secretary of Defense exceeded his authority by adopting a recommendation that did not meet the requirements of the 2021 NDAA section 370(g)(4) that required that local sensitivities be considered. The 8 person naming commission did not ask the opinion of anyone, not even the Congressionally mandated (10 U.S.C. § 7723) Oversight Committee, the Advisory Committee on Arlington National Cemetery. This is a grave site and an international tourist destination and our nation’s sacred shrine. No local sensitivities were considered. This whole thing is illegal.

c) The military (government) is putting the Cart Before the Horse - The Public Scoping Meeting of August 23, 2023 should have occurred BEFORE Secretary Austin decided to accept this recommendation. The Army is violating the 40 Code of Federal Relations Part 1500 Section 1500.1 (a) because they did not consider relevant environment information BEFORE the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army ordered removal of the Memorial. The military is trying to fix the legal mess it has made. This whole thing is illegal.

d) Fire, ready aim. The military/government broke the law whey they jumped the gun by holding the August 23, 2023 scoping meeting on mitigation before checking all the required regulatory boxes.

The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) 36 CFR 800.6 requires the Army to complete 6 steps PRIOR to seeking input from the consulting parties and the State Historic Preservation Offices on resolving adverse effects, including modifications or alternatives to avoid, minimize or mitigate a planned action. The Army did not complete all the steps and are trying to fix things now, but they didn’t follow the law and that can’t be fixed. The Army has not identified all the adverse effects. This whole thing is illegal.

e) Removal of the Reconciliation Memorial is Unconstitutional and an attack on the historical Diversity of American Culture. When the humanists wanted to take down a monument in Maryland the Bladensburg Cross, in its 2019 decision, the US Supreme Court said “Where monuments, symbols, and practices with a longstanding history follow in the tradition of the First Congress in respecting and tolerating different views, endeavoring to achieve inclusivity and nondiscrimination, and recognizing the important role religion plays in the lives of many Americans, they are likewise constitutional.“ This memorial cenotaph is a long-standing historical monument and it is unconstitutional after over 100 years, to up and decide that this is offensive and has to go. In fact, just the opposite is true, this memorial is inclusive. It shows various minority groups, and in fact, it was sculpted by a gay Jewish man. Taking down this memorial is Unconstitutional.

f) Removal of the Reconciliation Memorial is Unconstitutional and an attack on America’s Judeo Christian Heritage Ezekiel’s memorial contains is the only memorial at Arlington National Cemetery that includes a scripture verse Isaiah 2:4, “and they shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning-hooks.”. It is featured in the Museum of the Bible’s Washington Revolution’s flyover. When the humanists wanted to take down a monument in Maryland, the Bladensburg Cross, in its 2019 decision, the US Supreme Court said citing the French Revolution “... A government that roams the land, tearing down monuments with religious symbolism and scrubbing away any reference to the divine will strike many as aggressively hostile to religion. Militantly secular regimes have carried out such projects in the past and for those with a knowledge of history, the image of monuments being taken down will be evocative, disturbing, and divisive.” Taking down this memorial is Unconstitutional.

g) The enabling legislation is Unconstitutional as it represents a Bill of Attainder. Article 1 Section 9, clause 3 of the US Constitution says “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed. Bills of attainder are acts of the legislature that inflict punishments on a person supposedly guilty of high offenses. When Senator Elizabeth Warren called Confederate soldiers ‘traitors’ on the Senate Floor - a charge that was NEVER brought by the government after the war against any Confederate - and the 2021 NDAA was passed on that basis, Congress passed a bill of Attainder. As such, the whole thing is Unconstitutional. The right of secession was reserved by Virginia, New York and Rhode Island before those states joined the United States Constitution. All the other states accepted the right of secession of Virginia, New York and Rhode Island thus they had it too because all states entered the Union as exact equals.

OTHER IMPORTANT COMMENTS

2. MITIGATION

Background/Importance: As part of the regulatory review process, a property owner must look to mitigate any impacts to the environment or historic resources. This generally relates to replacing windows on historic buildings, etc. As noted above, in this case, the government is asking for input on mitigation even before they have identified the adverse effects to the Area of Potential Effect. Culture is a key word as it relates to mitigation.

a) Removal of the Reconciliation Memorial cannot be mitigated.

1. How do you mitigate removal of a memorial to American ‘reconciliation’? This memorial was erected as part of the reconciliation movement in America ignited by the victory in the Spanish-American war. This memorial stands unique in world history when a conquering nation honored the dead of its vanquished. When President Woodrow Wilson accepted the Memorial on behalf of the reunited and reconciled American people saying “nothing of this sort could have occurred in anything but a democracy…our solemn duty is to see that each one of us is in his own consciousness and in his own conduct a replica of this great reunited people”. There is no mitigation for de-reconciliation. The military is drastically short on recruiting - how will re-opening sectional differences help that? Over 44% of our military has traditionally been recruited in the South. The cultural impacts are unmitigatable.

2. Removing this Monument encourages division of our nation. Not everyone agrees with every monument in our country. Are we going to tear down the Washington Monument next because George Washington owned slaves? Are we going to tear down the Arlington House adjacent to the cemetery next because Robert E. Lee lived there? This is a slippery slope - there is no acceptable ‘mitigation' for the removal of this Memorial and even discussing it sets a dangerous precedent for any American monument anywhere and just encourages division and revolutionary iconoclasm. You can’t even discuss mitigation before you consider all the adverse affects including the cultural divide it will create - you’re putting the cart before the horse.

3. This monument is being weaponized against America in an asymmetrical war. There is an asymmetrical war going on against America, our unity, our heritage and our culture and this monument has been weaponized against us just like the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were. When the antisemitic Council of American Islamic Relations, with linkages to Hamas, came out for removing this Memorial, the Secretary of Defense should have considered that maybe, just maybe, he should re-look at this recommendation. But he decided first and listened later. This is like a kangaroo court where the execution is first and the judgment later. It is foolish to even consider mitigation before you have considered the multiple immense impacts of using our own history in the war against us, or even that there is a war going on against America.

4. Removal is a slippery slope and sets a dangerous precedent at not only Arlington but every National Military Cemetery. By accepting the fallacy of presentism which subjects all the monuments and memorials at Arlington to a bar that few historical sites will be able to withstand. After all, the US Army was not integrated until 1948. Some people are already saying that all monuments before civil rights should be removed. Using present standards to evaluate culture history, or “presentism” fails to take into account that, at the time in which historical events occurred, those involved did not enjoy the benefit of hindsight that has informed our present views. Will we take down the monuments to the Maine? How about the McClellan gate? The US Army during the Civil war under didn’t allow black soldiers to be buried with white soldiers. How about the Rough Riders monument? The Sheridan Memorial. Constantly re-looking out our past through the lens of the future is suicidal. You cannot mitigate the cultural effects that the precedent of removing this memorial sets.

5. Removal is an attack on America’s religious heritage. Of all the monuments and memorials in Arlington National Cemetery, Ezekiel’s memorial contains is the only memorial that includes a scripture verse (Isaiah 2:4, “and they shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning-hooks.”). Proverbs 22:28 commands us “Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.” The impact on our nationwide cultural heritage would be irreparably harmed and is unmitigatable.

6. Removal is an antisemitic attack on the deceased artist. This memorial is the only one sculpted by Jewish-American artist, Sir Moses Ezekiel. Despite being an ethnic minority, his artistic skill and his participation in the Civil War resulted in his award of this important project, which he designed specifically for the site to mark the graves of Southern civil war veterans. After his death, he was also buried at the base of the memorial, and the memorial became his grave marker. This is arguably the most important work of a Jewish sculptor in the world. Americans in the early 20th century showed their acceptance of Jewish artists at that time by selecting him to design this work. This attack on not only Ezekiel’s art but also his grave site will signal that antisemitism is alive and well at America’s most important military cemetery - Arlington National Cemetery - but would also telegraph to the world that American is now in lockstep with the radical elements in the middle east who want to see the extermination of the Jewish people. That cannot be mitigated.

7. Removal is an attack on America’s art heritage. Of all the monuments and memorials in Arlington National Cemetery, none are of the artistic quality of the Reconciliation memorial. The 30’ bronze was sculpted by world-renowned Jewish-American artist, Sir Moses Ezekiel. Ezekiel became the first non-German to win the Royal School of Art in Berlin’s prestigious art competition. Americans in the early 20th century showed in Despite being an ethnic minority, his artistic skill and his participation in the Civil War resulted in his award of this important project and it became his opus work, with over 30 life figures portraying life as he saw it as a young man in the American south. The figures portray various scenes including a young soldier receiving a minister’s blessing, a young woman tying a sash around the waist of her beloved and a scene of men marking in the ranks including a man with African features. Nowhere in America will this quality and diversity of sculptural art exist in an American military cemetery if it is removed. It is also the only beaux arts style memorial at Arlington National Cemetery. Art Historian Catesby Leigh calls the removal “the ultimate win for cancel culture” and as such cannot be mitigated.

8. Removal is politically motivated and the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) must consider this. Democrat US Senator Elizabeth Warren opportunistically offered the amendment to the 2021 NDAA in the aftermath of the highly politicized police-involved death of George Floyd. Then Republican President Trump vetoed the 2021 NDAA on December 23, 2020, after the contested 2020 presidential election because it “includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military's history”. The Naming Commission finished its work and submitted it during the highly contested 2022 Congressional elections and the ensuing contest for Republican Speaker of the House. During the Biden administration, the oversight committee for Arlington National Cemetery was suspended from the period of February 2020 until November 2022, and the ACANC was not able to conduct its oversight responsibilities, providing input to the Secretary of the Army as required by law ( 10 USC 7723). These partisan politics and national tensions which led to the removal recommendation and Austin decision to adopt it without ensuring compliance with historical and environmental protection laws and regulations and outside of the remit of the Naming Commission must be considered as part of the EIS.

3. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT (APE)

Background/Importance: The Army’s proposed “Area of Potential Affect is limited to a circular area that is limited to the boundaries of Arlington National Cemetery, and even excludes the Arlington House itself.

This is a huge issue because the actual Area of Potential Effect is the entire country, indeed, the entire world.

The Area of Potential Effect is too small because:

a) This Reconciliation Memorial is a part of the culture not only of America but the world. To say that the effect is limited to a small part of a cemetery is disingenuous. This Memorial is eligible to be a contributing object of its own historical significance in Arlington National Cemetery, which is a National Register Historic District, which is the only National Military Cemetery with that designation. Former Secretary of the Navy Jim Webb’s recent Op Ed in the Wall Street Journal shows how the memorial is a testament to how to re-unify a nation after a civil war. He used it with officials in Vietnam. If America cannot accept its own reconciliation, how can we promote it to other war torn cultures. The APE, as proposed, is just a small area inside the cemetery. This ignores the importance of the reconciliation message that America set by example for the world after our own bloody fratricidal war.

b) This memorial is part of the Washington Monumental Corridor Master Plan. The Monumental Corridor was part of the “American Renaissance” and North-South linkage promoted by renowned architects McMillan and Olmstead. They envisioned a “city beautiful” plan for Washington, DC that extended over the Potomac River into Virginia to Arlington House and the Cemetery. The bridge was to become a symbolic link between North and South from DC to Arlington and the addition of George Washington Memorial Parkway, punctuated with monuments and memorial evidenced this American Renaissance and to demonstrate to the world American unification. This beaux arts style memorial, is the most significant monumental artwork at Arlington is part of the American Renaissance which ignited in monumental art around the country., and as such is individually eligible for inclusion on the National Register. The entire Monumental Corridor, the Viewshed from Mount Vernon through to the Capitol must be included in the APE as they are part of the master plan and significant in the north-south reunification and the American Renaissance. The entire viewshed of the Washington Monumental core Master Plan should be included.

c) The Memorial Site has significance to Canada and other nations, and is eligible to be a UNSECO World Heritage Site. One of the graves in the plot marked by the memorial is of a Canadian citizen Jerry Cronan who was killed at the Battle of Spotsylvania. There were many more citizens of other nations who perished in service to one of the states represented on the Memorial. These other nations need to be identified and consulted as they are being impacted as well. Because of its significance in American history, Arlington House and the Arlington National Cemetery are eligible for listing as a UNESCO World Heritage site. I wonder why this has not been done. But listed or not, the impact on the world and peoples of the world must be considered.

d) The Memorial site has significance to those buried at it. There are over 500 soldiers and widows buried at the memorial. Some were relocated there from other sections of Arlington, others from POW camps nearby before the Memorial was erected. However, others chose to be buried there, undoubtedly because of the new Memorial. Who is speaking for them? How can the government determine views of the dead. No impact study on this can ever be complete as the voices of the people who chose to be interred around the memorial cannot be heard. We shouldn’t be messing with these peoples graves.

Links to Important Resources

Shop Now

View testimony which starts at 1:38:59.

Here is a link to Defend Arlington's donation page that states:

CHIP IN FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY MEMORIAL LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND. You can also pay with Zelle. Send to

DefendArlington@gmail.com.

Please Donate Now -- THANK YOU!

Click Here to Donate AND Share on Facebook, et al.

Defend Arlington update with link to February 28, 2023 Tucker Carlson interview with Christopher Bedford on the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington update, Tucker Carlson segment on YouTube

Defend Arlington's 385 Page Book of White Papers

Here is a link to an informative nine minute video, "The Arlington Confederate Monument," produced by the Abbeville Institute.

The Arlington Confederate Monument

PDF White Papers from Defend Arlington

Click Here for Bode Lang's excellent video

Here is a link to an excellent video of a Georgia lady calling out Elizabeth Warren and her Massachusetts hypocrisy.

Click Here for Georgia Lady Teaching Elizabeth Warren a Lesson

Here are important Southern Legal Resource Center links. SLRC mailing address is: Southern Legal Resource Center, 90 Church St., Black Mountain, NC 28711-3365.

Click Here to donate to the Southern Legal Resource Center

Click Here to follow on Facebook

Click Here to go to their website

¹ Ty Seidule, Robert E. Lee and Me, A Southerner's Reckoning with the Myth of the Lost Cause (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2020), 162.

² Ibid.

³ Law Insider defines LYING as "the misrepresentation of one or more facts in order to gain a benefit or harm another person, where the actor knows or should know that the misrepresentation will be relied upon by another person." https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/lying, accessed 8-1-23. If a person lies about one thing they will lie about many things.

⁴ James McPherson, quoted in Drew Gilpin Faust, This Republic of Suffering, Death and the American Civil War (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008), xii.

Commanding Wall Street Journal Op-Ed Supports Arlington Confederate Memorial

Posted on August 21, 2023August 21, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | 1 Comment

. . . during the Civil War, four slave states remained in the Union—Maryland, Delaware, Missouri and Kentucky—and none of them were required to give up slavery during the entire war. And that in every major battle of the Civil War, slave owners in the Union Army fought against non-slave-owners in the Confederate Army. . . . in the eyes of a Confederate soldier, if Lincoln had not freed slaves in the Union, why should the soldier be vilified for supposedly fighting on behalf of slavery?

Jim Webb, Wall Street Journal, August 19, 2023

Commanding Wall Street Journal Op-Ed Supports Arlington Confederate Memorial

Former U.S. senator from Virginia and Navy secretary, writes an excellent piece that appeared August 19, 2023 entitled "Save the Confederate Memorial at Arlington" (scroll down for a PDF)

IT IS CRUNCH TIME

We will save or lose the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in the next few weeks

Outstanding article by former Virginia senator and United States Navy secretay, Jim Webb, in the Wall Street Journal, Saturday, August 19, 2023.

[Publisher's Note, by Gene Kizer, Jr. - Before Elizabeth Warren and her Woke naming commission can desecrate Arlington National Cemetery by demolishing the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial, they must follow the Section 106 process required by the National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.

The public is encouraged to get involved.

This is your chance if you have been outraged at the politicization and falsification of American history in recent years by leftist academia and an ignorant news media that fewer than 20% of the public trusts.

Individuals can sign up to be apprised of everything going on, and they will be given opportunities to speak at Zoom meetings and/or post comments to NHPA and NEPA websites.

Click HERE for a PDF of the "Consulting Party Response Form for Section 106 Review Process" that will allow you to be kept informed and to be given opportunities to input your thoughts.

You can email the PDF (email address to send it to is included in the PDF) or print it and mail it.

Taking advantage of these opportunities is extremely important. The more speakers and writers we have the better. Every SCV camp and UDC chapter should have at least one person sign up and hopefully several. Newsletter editors especially should know what is going on so they can keep their members and allies informed.

We are fighting not only for the truth of American history but for the honor of Arlington National Cemetery itself.

There is no way that the Confederate Memorial, which is surrounded by 518 Southern graves in concentric circles emanating out from the magnificent monument, can be demolished without desecrating those graves forever and making them the target of hate and derision in what is supposed to be our nation's most sacred burial ground.

They would be 518 graves in concentric circles around a mangled shaft in Arlington National Cemetery.

That would dishonor each of the fifteen states represented by those graves and stain Arlington National Cemetery for all time. How can ANC be a sacred place if it dishonors and humiliates 518 soldier graves?

William McKinley, Union soldier and later president, said this about those 518 Confederate graves:

. . . every soldier's grave made during our unfortunate civil war is a tribute to American valor . . . And the time has now come . . . when in the spirit of fraternity we should share in the care of the graves of the Confederate soldiers . . . The cordial feeling now happily existing between the North and South prompts this gracious act and if it needed further justification it is found in the gallant loyalty to the Union and the flag so conspicuously shown in this year just passed by the sons and grandsons of those heroic dead.

Below, is part of Jim Webb's op/ed, "Save the Confederate Memorial at Arlington," published in the Wall Street Journal August 19, 2023. Click HERE for a PDF of the complete article. Following Webb's excerpt is my testimony August 11, 2023 by Zoom video before the Advisory Committee for Arlington National Cemetery.

Here is Webb's short bio from the article:

Mr. Webb was a Marine infantry officer in Vietnam, Navy secretary (1987-88) and a U.S. senator from Virginia (2007-13). He is the distinguished fellow at Notre Dame’s International Security Center.

Webb first notes enthusiastic Southern support for the Spanish-American War then talks about President William McKinley, who originated the idea for a Confederate reconciliation memorial in Arlington National Cemetery:

Four days after the Spanish-American war ended, McKinley proclaimed in Atlanta: “In the spirit of fraternity we should share with you in the care of the graves of Confederate soldiers.” In that call for national unity the Confederate Memorial was born. It was designed by internationally respected sculptor Moses Jacob Ezekiel, a Confederate veteran and the first Jewish graduate of the Virginia Military Institute, who asked to be buried at the memorial in Arlington National Cemetery. On one face of the memorial is the finest explanation of wartime service perhaps ever written, by a Confederate veteran who later became a Christian minister: “Not for fame or reward, not for place or for rank; not lured by ambition or goaded by necessity; but in simple obedience to duty as they understood it; these men suffered all, sacrificed all, dared all, and died.”
But now in this new world of woke, unless measures are taken very soon, by the end of this year the Confederate Memorial will be gone.
With surprising overbroadness, the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, passed in the midst of national racial and political upheaval, empowered a Naming Commission to “remove all names, symbols, displays, monuments and paraphernalia that honor or commemorate the Confederate States of America . . . or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America from all assets of the Department of Defense.” As part of that provision, Arlington National Cemetery has been ordered by Defense Department officials to remove the memorial by the end of this year, though the order is reportedly under review.
Having spent four years as a full committee counsel in the House and six years as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, I cannot imagine that the removal of this memorial, conceived and built with the sole purpose of healing the wounds of the Civil War and restoring national harmony, could be within the intent of a sweeping sentence placed inside a nearly trillion-dollar piece of legislation.
The larger and ultimate question reaches further into America’s atrophied understanding of the Civil War itself. What was it that Union Army veteran McKinley understood about the Confederate soldiers who opposed his infantry units on the battlefield that eludes today’s monument smashers and ad hominem destroyers of historical reputations?
McKinley’s fellow soldiers understood that during the Civil War, four slave states remained in the Union—Maryland, Delaware, Missouri and Kentucky—and none of them were required to give up slavery during the entire war. And that in every major battle of the Civil War, slave owners in the Union Army fought against non-slave-owners in the Confederate Army. They understood that President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation did not free the slaves in those states or in the areas of the South that had already been conquered. The proclamation freed only slaves in the areas taken after it was issued. And in the eyes of a Confederate soldier, if Lincoln had not freed slaves in the union, why should the soldier be vilified for supposedly fighting on behalf of slavery?
Many soldiers in the North, and many more in the South, would have understood what John Hope Franklin (1915-2009), America’s most esteemed black historian, pointed out: In 1860 only 5% of whites in the South owned slaves, and less than 25% of whites benefited economically from slavery. An estimated 258,000 Confederate soldiers died in the war, about a third of all those who fought for the South. Few owned slaves. So why did they fight?
The soldier who wrote the inscription on the Confederate Memorial knew. And so did President McKinley and most veterans who have fought in America’s wars.

Video Testimony of Gene Kizer, Jr. to the Advisory Committee on Arlington National Cemetery, August 11, 2023 (emphasis was for my own use)

Good afternoon, and thank you for your service. I'm Gene Kizer, Jr. of Charleston Athenaeum Press.

When the Ranger Memorial in former Fort Benning was DESECRATED by the same legislation that threatens the 109 year old Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery, Brigadier General Joseph S. Stringham (ret), chairman of the National Ranger Memorial Foundation, wrote to his Rangers and said:

The naming commission's recommendations are "WITHOUT VERIFICATION."
Implementation of dramatic / radical edicts and shifts in policy at issue here are frequently accompanied by inaccuracies, (stupid) interpretations, injustices to survivors and a strong political slant offensive to substantial sectors of society.

That is also the case with the Confederate Memorial.

The naming commission submitted a false report on the Confederate Memorial. The Confederate Memorial should not be in its remit.

The Confederate Memorial does not commemorate the Confederacy unless you think that is why Barack Obama sent his ANNUAL MEMORIAL WREATH to the Confederate Memorial.

Obama and all presidents since Teddy Roosevent were celebrating the reconciliation and reunification of the United States of America after a war in which 750,000 died and over a million were maimed.

The reconciliation theme is irrefutable and in ANC's own documents repeatedly.

Demolishing the world class Confederate Monument surrounded by 518 graves will desecrate those graves forever and DISHONOR every Southerner who has ever bled and died for our great nation. It will stain Arlington National Cemetery for all time.

The Army can't even recruit today and this will sure not help it since 44% of our military has traditionally been recruited in the South.

We are Americans. We should act like it and stop acting like the Taliban.

### END ###

There is a Section 106 Zoom meeting Wednesday, August 23, 2023 from 7 to 9 p.m. EST that you can sign up for right now, to speak or post a comment. Click HERE to sign up, then click HERE to let Defend Arlington know you have signed up so we will know our strength (the more the better!).]

Links to Important Resources

Shop Now

View testimony which starts at 1:38:59.

Here is a link to Defend Arlington's donation page that states:

CHIP IN FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY MEMORIAL LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND. You can also pay with Zelle. Send to

DefendArlington@gmail.com.

Please Donate Now -- THANK YOU!

Click Here to Donate AND Share on Facebook, et al.

Defend Arlington update with link to February 28, 2023 Tucker Carlson interview with Christopher Bedford on the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington update, Tucker Carlson segment on YouTube

Defend Arlington's 385 Page Book of White Papers

Here is a link to an informative nine minute video, "The Arlington Confederate Monument," produced by the Abbeville Institute.

The Arlington Confederate Monument

PDF White Papers from Defend Arlington

Click Here for Bode Lang's excellent video

Here is a link to an excellent video of a Georgia lady calling out Elizabeth Warren and her Massachusetts hypocrisy.

Click Here for Georgia Lady Teaching Elizabeth Warren a Lesson

Here are important Southern Legal Resource Center links. SLRC mailing address is: Southern Legal Resource Center, 90 Church St., Black Mountain, NC 28711-3365.

Click Here to donate to the Southern Legal Resource Center

Click Here to follow on Facebook

Click Here to go to their website

Slavery in Fact and Fiction, Southern Slavery as It Really Was, Guest Post by Leonard M. “Mike” Scruggs

Posted on August 1, 2023August 1, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | 1 Comment

Slavery in Fact and Fiction

Guest Post by Leonard M. "Mike" Scruggs

A Historical Perspective on American Slavery

Southern Slavery as It Really Was

FROM DESCRIPTION ON AMAZON: The view that slavery could best be described by those who had themselves experienced it personally has found expression in several thousand commentaries, autobiographies, narratives, and interviews with those who "endured." Although most of these accounts appeared before the Civil War, more than one-third are the result of the ambitious efforts of the Federal Writers' Project of the Works Progress Administration (WPA) to interview surviving ex-slaves during the 1930s. The result of these efforts was the Slave Narrative Collection, a group of autobiographical accounts of former slaves that today stands as one of the most enduring and noteworthy achievements of the WPA. Compiled in seventeen states during the years 1936-38, the collection consists of more than two thousand interviews with former slaves, most of them first-person accounts of slave life and the respondents' own reactions to bondage. The interviews afforded aged ex-slaves an unparalleled opportunity to give their personal accounts of life under the "peculiar institution," to describe in their own words what it felt like to be a slave in the United States. ―Norman R. Yetman, American Memory, Library of Congress This paperback edition of selected Mississippi narratives is reprinted in facsimile from the typewritten pages of the interviewers, just as they were originally typed.

Slave Narratives, Alabama.

Slave Narratives, Virginia.

[Publisher's Note, by Gene Kizer, Jr. - Following Mike's bio and article are links to his website and to The Times Examiner where you can find his excellent columns.

Please support Defend Arlington and our efforts to save the magnificent 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery, which is slated for demolition thanks to Elizabeth Warren and her naming commission and its FALSE report to Congress with respect to the Confederate Memorial.

Destroying a world class 109 year old monument to war dead that is surrounded by 518 Confederate graves in concentric circles emanating out from the monument would put a scab on Arlington National Cemetery for all time and dishonor everybody buried there.

We can not allow that.

The Confederate Memorial should not even be in the naming commission's remit. It does not commemorate the Confederacy as required by Warren's legislation for the naming commission to have any say.

It commemorates the reconciliation of North and South and the reuniting of the United States of America after a war in which 750,000 died and over a million were maimed.

Historian James McPherson wrote:

the overall mortality rate for the South exceeded that of any country in World War I and that of all but the region between the Rhine and the Volga in World War II."ⁱ

The reconciliation theme symbolized by the Confederate Memorial is irrefutable and stated clearly in numerous places by Arlington National Cemetery itself in its 2014 registration for its Historic District to be on the National Register of Historic Places.

The naming commission in its FALSE report to Congress on the Confederate Monument did not mention the reconciliation theme or any of the monument's important history though it was DEFINITELY known to them.

Elizabeth Warren's Woke naming commission, which has added to our military recruiting crisis by falsifying Southern history, left all of the following out:

The monument was the idea of Union soldier and later president, William McKinley, after enthusiastic Southern participation in the Spanish-American War, and it was approved by Congress.

McKinley said:

. . . every soldier's grave made during our unfortunate civil war is a tribute to American valor . . . And the time has now come . . . when in the spirit of fraternity we should share in the care of the graves of the Confederate soldiers . . . The cordial feeling now happily existing between the North and South prompts this gracious act and if it needed further justification it is found in the gallant loyalty to the Union and the flag so conspicuously shown in this year just passed by the sons and grandsons of those heroic dead.

President William Howard Taft spoke and was warmly received at the UDC ceremony the evening the cornerstone was laid.

President Woodrow Wilson gave the dedication speech June 4, 1914.

President Theodore Roosevelt sent the first memorial wreath that started an annual tradition observed by all presidents including Barack Obama.

President Warren G. Harding sent a message of condolence to be read at the funeral of the monument's acclaimed Jewish sculptor, Moses Ezekiel, who was a VMI Confederate soldier.

Ezekiel created the Confederate Monument in the City of Rome, Italy and is buried next to his monument in Arlington National Cemetery along with two other Confederate soldiers and a Confederate sailor.

Veterans North and South, with love and enthusiasm for our reunited nation, supported the monument and spoke at its ceremonies.

A hundred page book of all the participants, speeches and history was published in 1914 by the UDC and is available on Amazon. The title is: History of the Arlington Confederate Monument, by Hilary A. Herbert, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Arlington Confederate Monument Association. It is available in hardback or softcover.

Remember, those were the days of the 50th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg and the famous handshakes across the wall by the old Union and Confederate veterans.

Naming commission vice chair, Ty Seidule, a leftist who hates the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery, admits the reconciliation theme and wrote about it in his book, Robert E. Lee and Me, though he left that out of the naming commission's report to Congress.

On page 162 of Robert E. Lee and Me, Seidule writes:

Of the thousands of monuments around the country to the Confederacy, the one in Arlington National Cemetery angers me the most. Every year, the commander in chief sends a wreath, ensuring the Confederate monument receives all the prestige of the U.S. government. That's why it riles me so much. . . .ⁱⁱ

Seidule then admits that the Confederate Memorial stands for reconciliation:

I know both political parties and white citizens in the North and South brought the country back together after the tremendous bloodletting and destruction of the Civil War. The posts named for Confederate officers during World War I also served to knit white America back together as it fought a common foe. And it worked, but we must recognize that reconciliation came at a steep and horrifying cost. African Americans paid the price with lynching, Jim Crow segregation, and the loss of the franchise. The price for white reconciliation remains far too high. (Bold emphasis added.)ⁱⁱⁱ

So, the naming commission and its vice chair definitely knew the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery symbolizes peace, patriotism and the reunification of the United States of America but they did not say a word about it, which makes their report, with respect to the Confederate Memorial, a LIE.^iv

Having viewed a large amount of public statuary from the beaux-arts era (1850-1914), it is my professional opinion that the Memorial is a serious, iconographically complex and technically accomplished piece of art. In my view, it is a handsome sculpture and an entirely appropriate funerary monument. I consider it an internationally significant piece of art of its type and era. Any nation should be proud to host such a magnanimous and dignified monument.
The inscription “And they shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning hooks” provides a Biblical guidance to turning from war to peace. This is echoed by the personification of the South, which holds the wreath of glory and touches the plough of peaceful prosperity. The frieze below depicts the contributions of those who supported the war effort.

Please scroll down to the "Links to Important Resources" and make a donation. We need money for our crack legal team to continue our litigation.

We CAN win this fight!

Please help us make Woke ignorance and hate DIE at Arlington National Cemetery.]

Mike Scruggs is the author of two books - The Un-Civil War, Shattering the Historical Myths; and Lessons from the Vietnam War, Truths the Media Never Told You - and over 600 articles on military history, national security, intelligent design, genealogical genetics, immigration, current political affairs, Islam, and the Middle East.

The abridged version of The Un-Civil War sold over 40,000 copies and won the prestigious D. T. Smithwick Award by the North Carolina Society of Historians, for excellence.

Mike holds a BS degree from the University of Georgia and an MBA from Stanford University. A former USAF intelligence officer and Air Commando, he is a decorated combat veteran of the Vietnam War and holds the Distinguished Flying Cross, Purple Heart, and Air Medal. He is a retired First Vice President for a major national financial services firm and former Chairman of the Board of a classical Christian school.

Slavery in Fact and Fiction

By Mike Scruggs
(First published in The Times Examiner, 24 July 2023)

A Historical Perspective on American Slavery

THE IMAGE OF AMERICAN SLAVERY in the minds of most people today is one of chains, bullwhips, cruelty, and arrogant human abuse. This was often true of the transportation of slaves associated with the slave trade but was largely untrue of the practice of slavery on American shores. Some inexcusable human abuses did occur under American slavery and should not be condoned, but such abuses were far less common than generally assumed.

Even Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin, based principally on accounts of runaway slaves, Southern newspaper records of slave masters prosecuted by Southern state governments, and only very limited firsthand familiarity with the South, gives a more balanced picture of slavery than the common modern image.

The universal evidence of history indicates that the institution of slavery in various forms existed from the most ancient times in every recorded civilization.

Southern Slavery as It Really Was

The two richest sources on the actual conditions of slavery in the South prior to its Constitutional end are Robert Fogel and Stanley Engerman’s formidable academic study entitled, Time on the Cross, published in 1974, and the Roosevelt Administration’s publication record of interviews of about 2,300 former slaves conducted from 1936 through 1938.

These systematically designed interviews were published by state in a multi-volume series usually called The Slave Narratives. Because these two sources combined give both statistical data and thousands of eyewitness testimonies, they are a historical gold mine.

However, because they both present a historical account of Southern slavery generally contradictory to what is now fashionable or even mandatory in most academic, media, and government circles, they are now largely neglected. Although academic freedom is under attack in the U.S. and other Western countries, The Slave Narratives are presently available on the internet. More than a dozen of the state volumes are available in paperback from Amazon.

Despite the South’s largely agricultural economy, only about 26 percent of Southern families actually owned slaves.

Many people, including even prominent slave owners, saw slavery as extremely dangerous and inconsistent with their concept of liberty. Among these were Washington, Jefferson, Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, Robert E. Lee, and John Randolph. Probably, a majority of Southerners would gladly have phased out slavery, but no one, North or South [including Abraham Lincoln before the war as he stated] could see how it could be done without causing extreme economic hardship on the country and harming the U.S. export trade.

According to Fogel and Engerman, the material conditions of Southern black slaves compared favorably to Northern industrial whites. Their caloric intake, for example, was ten percent greater than free whites.

The vitamin content of the slave diet far exceeded that of whites and the recommended daily levels established in 1964. The protein content was 110 percent greater and the iron content 230 percent greater than the minimum daily requirement.

According to testimonies in The Slave Narratives, it is very evident that slaves enjoyed abundant, varied, and much appreciated food. The reason the nutrient value of the slave diet exceeded that of whites so much was that the whites ate white potatoes, while the slaves enjoyed the much more nutritious sweet potatoes. Most slave families were also allowed their own small gardens, most frequently planted with sweet potatoes.

While most slaves were field hands or household servants, there were significant numbers in other occupations.

Seven percent of slaves, almost all of them males, were essentially part of the plantation management staff. Such positions were foremen (or drivers), overseers, and even general managers. In fact, most field foremen were black slaves.

Another twelve percent were skilled craftsmen such as carpenters and blacksmiths. About seven percent were semi-skilled, which included teamsters and many household servants.

Housing standards for Southern slaves in 1860 compared favorably to free whites. There were 5.3 persons per white household and 5.2 persons per slave household.

Only rarely was there more than one family per slave cabin. Most slave cabins were about 360 square feet of ground space plus sleeping lofts for children and some porch space. This exceeded the average living space of New York City households in 1892 [27 years after the War Between the States].

Medical care for the average Southern slave was considerably better than for the white Northern factory worker. Most larger plantations maintained a substantial hospital. These were usually visited by the same doctor that treated the plantation owners and white employees. The largest plantations had full-time doctors.

The hospitals were usually staffed with one or more full-time slaves acting as nurses and midwives. They were typically elderly slaves who could no longer perform physical labor. Other slave-women specialized in caring for the children on the plantation.

The average slave lifespan was only 36 in 1850, comparable to Northern industrial workers and whites in France, Italy, and the Netherlands, but four years less than the average of all American whites.

The maternal death rate of slaves in childbearing was 167 per thousand births. While this is very high by modern standards, it was slightly less for slaves than whites.

The infant mortality rate for slaves was 183 per thousand, about three percent higher than white Southerners.

The slave suicide rate was only one in ten thousand per year, only one third that of whites.

The standard issue of slave clothing was quite adequate. The clothing was not fashionable, but very sturdy. Slaves were generally issued two pairs of shoes per year, made of high quality leather.

Contrary to popular belief, slave owners generally relied on motivational incentives rather than the whip to increase the work efficiency of slaves. Some typical incentives were cash payments, time off, team bonuses, and the opportunity to make money selling produce from their own gardens and small plots of land.

Many plantations worked on a task system. A slave was assigned tasks that could be easily accomplished in a day. They usually finished these tasks ahead of schedule and used the time to rest, visit, or work on their own accounts. Some were allowed to work off the plantation to earn additional money.

Another astonishing statistic derived from Fogel and Engerman’s data is that when the cost of food, housing, clothes, and healthcare, plus various kinds of cash incentive pay are added, the total compensation of the average slave was fifteen percent higher than the pay of comparable free agricultural workers in the South.

Fogel and Engerman also estimate that the owner share of slave production after expenses was only about 14 percent. Today almost all workers pay more than 14 percent of their income in various payroll taxes.

Slave maintenance costs were from cradle to grave. It took slightly more than 21 years from birth to breakeven. Slave labor could not therefore be said to be irresistibly profitable.

Slavery was probably a doomed economic system that could not have lasted another generation. Slavery was not the cause of the War and would have ended without the War, just as it did in all other countries.

Also contrary to popular opinion, the slave family was usually kept together and had strong patriarchal rather than matriarchal features. They had de facto ownership of homes and gardens and were allowed to keep incentive and other entrepreneurial earnings for themselves.

The unit of plantation distribution was the family. Marriage ceremonies were often performed, although many were de facto.

One moral defect of the slave system was that slave families could be broken up. On average, only one slave in 22 was sold in a year, but the cumulative effect could be destabilizing. At least a third of these were estate sale disbursements. Most family separations occurred because of westward migration.

Roughly 80 percent of the Slave Narrative interviews indicate former slaves had a favorable opinion of their masters, many of them remarkable in their affection and praise.

About 5 percent demonstrate an unfavorable memory, some of them shameful.

Perhaps the most remarkable impression given by The Slave Narratives is the prevalence of Christian faith and affectionate bonds between master and slave in the South.

Those who have been led to see the relationship of master and slave in the South as one of cruel tyranny by masters and suppressed resentment on the part of slaves may be stunned to read so many interviews that demonstrate common respect and affection instead.

These positive and affectionate recollections are so numerous that they make a strong and immediate impression. You may read some of these in my book, The Un-Civil War: Shattering the Historical Myths, 2011.

ⁱ James McPherson, quoted in Drew Gilpin Faust, This Republic of Suffering, Death and the American Civil War (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008), xii.

ⁱⁱ Ty Seidule, Robert E. Lee and Me, A Southerner's Reckoning with the Myth of the Lost Cause (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2020), 162.

ⁱⁱⁱ Ibid.

^iv Law Insider defines LYING as "the misrepresentation of one or more facts in order to gain a benefit or harm another person, where the actor knows or should know that the misrepresentation will be relied upon by another person." https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/lying, accessed 8-1-23. If a person lies about one thing they will lie about many things.

Link to The Times Examiner website: www.timesexaminer.com

Link to Mike Scruggs's columns at The Times Examiner: https://www.timesexaminer.com/mike-scruggs

Link to Mike's book website:

https://www.universalmediainc.org/books/. His books are also available on Amazon and other places.

Links to Important Resources

Shop Now

View testimony which starts at 1:38:59.

Here is a link to Defend Arlington's donation page that states:

CHIP IN FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY MEMORIAL LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND. You can also pay with Zelle. Send to

DefendArlington@gmail.com.

Please Donate Now -- THANK YOU!

Click Here to Donate AND Share on Facebook, et al.

Defend Arlington update with link to February 28, 2023 Tucker Carlson interview with Christopher Bedford on the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington update, Tucker Carlson segment on YouTube

Defend Arlington's 385 Page Book of White Papers

Here is a link to an informative nine minute video, "The Arlington Confederate Monument," produced by the Abbeville Institute.

The Arlington Confederate Monument

PDF White Papers from Defend Arlington

Click Here for Bode Lang's excellent video

Here is a link to an excellent video of a Georgia lady calling out Elizabeth Warren and her Massachusetts hypocrisy.

Click Here for Georgia Lady Teaching Elizabeth Warren a Lesson

Here are important Southern Legal Resource Center links. SLRC mailing address is: Southern Legal Resource Center, 90 Church St., Black Mountain, NC 28711-3365.

Click Here to donate to the Southern Legal Resource Center

Click Here to follow on Facebook

Click Here to go to their website

Dear Tommy Tuberville, United States Senator from Alabama . . . Thank you for showing cowardly Republicans how to fight and win

Posted on July 22, 2023July 23, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | No Comments

Dear Tommy Tuberville, United States Senator from Alabama . . .

Thank you for showing cowardly Republicans how to fight and win

U.S. Army recruiting was short 25% last year and is short 30% this year

It is not just the military that's in trouble

Arlington National Cemetery will be desecrated in the next few weeks

Dear Senator Tuberville,

I am a lifelong Republican and except for a few instances like President Trump, President Reagan, and today's Freedom Caucuses, I have spent most of my life DISGUSTED with cowardly Republicans who never stand up for their voters but cower and run to prevent Democrats and the fraud media from calling them names.

Your holding up military promotions over Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin's immoral abortion policy ¹ has finally gotten their attention so go ahead and use that approach to save the whole military and Arlington National Cemetery.

There are only two things you need to do to save our military and Arlington National Cemetery.

THE FIRST is get rid of racist Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and the DEI bureaucracy Biden has spent $114 million dollars entrenching in our military.² Talk about injecting cancer into a healthy body:

For context, diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives (often abbreviated to DEI) promote a divisive and poisonous ideology that's dismissive of merit and discriminates based on characteristics such as skin color and sexual orientation. Individuals who qualify for a certain position due to their merits but don't meet the discriminating entity's goal of being more "diverse" are passed over in favor of those who meet the preferred identitarian standards.³

DEI and other Woke policies have obliterated the two main pipelines of recruits into the military, the first of which is the encouragement of veterans, parents, coaches and others for young people to serve.

Around 80% of recruits come from veteran families who have revered military service for generations, men and women who have served, sacrificed and often died for our country.

Many of those good people are not recommending military service because they know today's military is led by people who often advanced because they are Woke, not because they are good.

This military uses drag queens for recruiting and makes women shower with men. It is less and less merit based.

Nobody in his right mind would encourage their precious children to join an organization committed to a racist ideology where skin color counts but merit does not, which is the essence of DEI.

Until Biden, it was agreed that our military was the greatest colorblind meritocracy in history and above politics, but not today.

THE SECOND THING YOU NEED TO DO is help us save the magnificent 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery. Over 44% of our military is recruited in the South yet Elizabeth Warren's naming commission, as part of her legislation renaming bases in the South, has slated it for demolition.

That will shred the fabric of our country and add to the recruiting crisis.

It will also desecrate Arlington National Cemetery for all time and dishonor everybody buried there.

The Wall Street Journal wrote June 30, 2023 about the Southern military tradition, which goes back to the founding of our country. Before the age of Wokeness, our military recruited easily:

by relying heavily on veterans and military families to develop the next generation of recruits, especially in the region known in the military as the “Southern Smile,” a curving region from the mid-Atlantic and down across the southern U.S.⁴ (bold emphasis added)

We can not allow that pipeline of patriotic Southerners to be destroyed by racist Woke ideology.

The Confederate Memorial and Confederate-associated names on the Ranger Memorial at former Fort Benning should not even be in the naming commission's remit as they claim.

Those things do not commemorate the Confederacy as Elizabeth Warren's history-falsifying legislation requires.

The Confederate Memorial commemorates the reconciliation of the United States of America after a war in which 750,000 died and a million were maimed.

The names on the Ranger Memorial represent timeless American valor, patriotism and sacrifice.

The theme of reconciliation symbolized by the Confederate Memorial is irrefutable, though it was deliberately left out of the naming commission's report to Congress and Secretary Austin.

Arlington National Cemetery, itself, said repeatedly in multiple places in its 2014 application for its Historic District to be on the National Register of Historic Places, that the Confederate Memorial commemorates the reconciliation of North and South and the reunification of our country.

The Confederate Memorial was conceived by a Union soldier later president, William McKinley, after enthusiastic Southern participation in the Spanish American War. There are 518 Confederate graves in concentric circles emanating out from the magnificent monument. About those Confederate graves, McKinley said:

. . . every soldier's grave made during our unfortunate civil war is a tribute to American valor . . . And the time has now come . . . when in the spirit of fraternity we should share in the care of the graves of the Confederate soldiers . . . The cordial feeling now happily existing between the North and South prompts this gracious act and if it needed further justification it is found in the gallant loyalty to the Union and the flag so conspicuously shown in this year just passed by the sons and grandsons of those heroic dead.

Warren G. Harding sent a message of condolence to the funeral of sculptor Moses Ezekiel.

Theodore Roosevelt sent the first annual memorial wreath, starting a tradition observed by all presidents including Barack Obama.

President Obama and the others were not commemorating the Confederacy as required by Elizabeth Warren's legislation for the naming commission to have any say. They were commemorating the reconciliation of our country after the bloody war.

Veterans North and South enthusiastically supported the Confederate Memorial and also spoke at the cornerstone laying and dedication.

Remember, those were the days of the 50th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg and the famous handshakes across the wall by the old Union and Confederate veterans.

Demolishing the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial, if it is falsely or incorrectly claimed to be within the remit of the naming commission, has to be illegal and should be the subject of Congressional action and another law suit.

There is also a serious issue of truthfulness with the naming commission's report to Congress and Secretary of Defense Austin concerning the Confederate Memorial.

Naming commission vice chair, Ty Seidule, a leftist who hates the Confederate Memorial in Arlington, admits the reconciliation theme and wrote about it in his book, Robert E. Lee and Me, though he left that critical information out of the naming commission's report to Congress, thus making that report NOT THE TRUTH.

I doubt if Austin would have approved demolishing a magnificent 109 year old monument to peace and reconciliation in our nation's most sacred burial ground if he had been given the complete history.

On page 162 of Robert E. Lee and Me, Seidule writes:

Of the thousands of monuments around the country to the Confederacy, the one in Arlington National Cemetery angers me the most. Every year, the commander in chief sends a wreath, ensuring the Confederate monument receives all the prestige of the U.S. government. That's why it riles me so much. . . .⁵

Seidule then admits that the Confederate Memorial stands for reconciliation:

I know both political parties and white citizens in the North and South brought the country back together after the tremendous bloodletting and destruction of the Civil War. The posts named for Confederate officers during World War I also served to knit white America back together as it fought a common foe. And it worked, but we must recognize that reconciliation came at a steep and horrifying cost. African Americans paid the price with lynching, Jim Crow segregation, and the loss of the franchise. The price for white reconciliation remains far too high. (Bold emphasis added.)⁶

It is absurd to say that our country should not have come back together in peace, love and patriotism, but it shows how the Woke mind works.

Elizabeth Warren and her naming commission want to dishonor "those heroic dead" whom McKinley spoke about, which also dishonors their descendants who have spilled oceans of Southern blood on battlefields across the globe for our great country.

I don't think dishonoring Southerners would be good for recruiting in the Southern Smile part of America in which 44% of our military is recruited. Is Elizabeth Warren evil or just stupid?

The 518 Confederate graves in Section 16 of Arlington National Cemetery come from 15 states on whose soil "those heroic dead" were born, nurtured and grew to manhood. Those states are the heart of Republican voting strength and power, which is why Elizabeth Warren loves dishonoring them.

Georgia

Tennessee

Virginia

North Carolina

Maryland

South Carolina

Florida

Alabama

Mississippi

Arkansas

Missouri

Nevada

Texas

Louisiana

Iowa

Numerous Unknown

Please see my article: List of the 518 Confederate Burials in Arlington National Cemetery, Concentric circles of graves extend out from the magnificent Confederate Monument . . .

Warren and her naming commission would have those 518 Southern dead facing a mangled shaft that was once a world-class monument, about whose creator art scholar Michael Robert Patterson said:

[N]o sculptor, as far as known, has ever, in any one memorial told as much history as has Ezekiel in his monument at Arlington; and every human figure in it, as well as every symbol, is in and of itself a work of art.

Leftists like Warren love to signal their virtue, though the truth is, they have none.

Elizabeth Warren lied about her ethnicity for years to game the affirmative action system (see narrative endnote below).⁷

New England history is not superior to Southern history.

Elizabeth Warren blames Southerners for slavery but New Englanders and especially Bostonians brought all the slaves here and made huge fortunes in the process.

New Englanders and New Yorkers were America's slave traders.

They sailed to Africa's west coast and chained poor Africans to decks inside the bowels of their scorching hot slave ships.

Poor slaves had to endure the stench of vomit, urine, feces and death cooked in oven-like heat with no ventilation for months through the Middle Passage so Elizabeth Warren's New Englanders could make money.

Boston and New York were the largest slave trading ports on earth 54 years after the slave trade was outlawed by the U.S. Constitution.

W. E. B. Du Bois in his famous book, The Suppression of the African Slave-Trade to the United States of America 1638-1870, writes that Boston, New York and Portland, Maine were the largest slave trading ports on the planet in 1862, a year into the War Between the States. They had been slave trading illegally since 1808.

Elizabeth Warren holds money-grubbing, slave-trading New Englanders above Southerners defending their homes and families from a barbaric invasion.

The North did not go to war to end slavery.

They went to war because they knew our country was going to be the premier power on earth and they wanted to control it with the votes of their larger population. Northern wealth and power depended on the North dominating the Union.

Things like the Corwin Amendment that Lincoln and the North supported, which would have left black people in slavery forever even beyond the reach of Congress, and the War Aims Resolution that stated the war was not about interfering with slavery but only preserving the Union, prove the North did not go to war to end slavery. They went to war for their own wealth and power, the same reason most countries invade other countries as the North did the South.

Dishonest historians also leave out the six slave states that fought for the North the entire war. West Virginia came into the Union as a slave state just weeks after the Emancipation Proclamation took effect.

Senator Tuberville, DEI has to be culled out of our military immediately before it destroys the pipeline of recruits who sign up because proud veterans encouraged them to sign up.

The 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery can not be demolished. Americans do not destroy monuments in cemeteries to war dead and peace.

The Confederate Memorial reunited our country and opened a pipeline of patriotic Southerners to serve with relish in the United States Military, which is more important today than ever.

Current military leaders are incapable of solving our recruiting crisis because they have to obey their commander in chief who is the one that established the racist DEI Woke bureaucracy in the military.

Republicans are going to have to save our military one way or another.

You have the right approach and are effective.

Other Republicans need to follow your lead and GET IN THE GAME before it is too late.

Thank You, and God Bless America!

TO READERS: We can beat Elizabeth Warren and save the magnificent Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery but we need money for our crack legal team!

Please make a donation immediately if you can. Get your camps and chapters to give. NOW is the time. The next few weeks are critical.

Stand up and fight!

Make Woke ignorance DIE at Arlington National Cemetery.

Please scroll down and give all you can, and THANK YOU!!!!!

Links to Important Resources

Shop Now

View testimony which starts at 1:38:59.

Here is a link to Defend Arlington's donation page that states:

CHIP IN FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY MEMORIAL LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND. You can also pay with Zelle. Send to

DefendArlington@gmail.com.

Please Donate Now -- THANK YOU!

Click Here to Donate AND Share on Facebook, et al.

Defend Arlington update with link to February 28, 2023 Tucker Carlson interview with Christopher Bedford on the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington update, Tucker Carlson segment on YouTube

Defend Arlington's 385 Page Book of White Papers

Here is a link to an informative nine minute video, "The Arlington Confederate Monument," produced by the Abbeville Institute.

The Arlington Confederate Monument

PDF White Papers from Defend Arlington

Click Here for Bode Lang's excellent video

Here is a link to an excellent video of a Georgia lady calling out Elizabeth Warren and her Massachusetts hypocrisy.

Click Here for Georgia Lady Teaching Elizabeth Warren a Lesson

Here are important Southern Legal Resource Center links. SLRC mailing address is: Southern Legal Resource Center, 90 Church St., Black Mountain, NC 28711-3365.

Click Here to donate to the Southern Legal Resource Center

Click Here to follow on Facebook

Click Here to go to their website

¹ Jordan Boyd, "Biden Regime, Corporate Media Blame The Military Abortion Fight They Started On Republicans," July 14, 2023, The Federalist, https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/14/biden-regime-corporate-media-blame-the-military-abortion-fight-they-started-on-republicans, accessed 7-15-23.

² Adam Kredo, March 28, 2023, "'Once In A Generation Crisis': Vets Blame Biden's Focus on Woke Priorities for Low Military Recruitment Numbers, Biden's Pentagon has pumped around $114 million into diversity, equity, and inclusion programs," Washington Free Beacon, https://freebeacon.com/national-security/once-in-a-generation-crisis-vets-blame-bidens-focus-on-woke-priorities-for-low-military-recruitment-numbers/, accessed 7-22-23.

³ Shawn Fleetwood, June 21, 2023, "House Committee Advances Amendment Restoring Meritocracy to Military Personnel Decisions," https://thefederalist.com/2023/06/21/house-committee-advances-amendment-restoring-meritocracy-to-military-personnel-decisions/, accessed 6-22-23.

⁴ Ben Kesling, "The Military Recruiting Crisis: Even Veterans Don’t Want Their Families to Join,

Pentagon scrambles to retain the main pipeline for new service members as disillusioned families steer young people away," June 30, 2023, https://www.wsj.com/articles/military-recruiting-crisis-veterans-dont-want-their-children-to-join-510e1a25, accessed 6-30-23.

⁵ Ty Seidule, Robert E. Lee and Me, A Southerner's Reckoning with the Myth of the Lost Cause (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2020), 162.

⁶ Ibid.

⁷ Briahna Gray, October 16, 2018, "What Elizabeth Warren Still Doesn't Get," The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2018/10/16/elizabeth-warren-dna-video-native-american-harvard/. The article includes: ". . . Warren held herself out as Native American, allowing Harvard Law School to use her as cover for its impotent diversity efforts" and:

"According to a much-cited investigation by the Boston Globe, Warren consistently checked "white" on personnel forms throughout her career, including in 1981, 1985, and 1998 while employed at the University of Texas. But in the 1986-1987 edition of the Association of American Law School's directory and eight subsequent editions, Warren listed herself as a minority. She began identifying as Native American on personnel forms three years into her post at the University of Pennsylvania. And while multiple professors have attested to the fact that Warren was considered white during the hiring process at Harvard University, in 1995 she self-identified as Native American, and the school's statistics were updated to reflect as much. Harvard recorded Warren as Native American from 1995 to 2004."

Elizabeth Warren and her naming commission add to military recruiting crisis

Posted on July 9, 2023July 11, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | 2 Comments

Elizabeth Warren and her naming commission add to military recruiting crisis

"US Military's Recruiting Woes Are a National Security Crisis" according to Military.com July 6, 2023

"The Military Recruiting Crisis: Even Veterans Don't Want Their Families to Join" according to the Wall Street Journal June 30, 2023

**44% of our military is traditionally recruited in the South (see "Southern Smile" from Wall Street Journal article below)**

But Woke naming commission wants the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial surrounded by 518 Southern graves in Arlington National Cemetery demolished

You think we are in a recruiting crisis now?

EVERY DAY MORE ARTICLES COME OUT on our military recruiting crisis caused by Biden's Woke policies, the worst of which replaces merit with racist Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, but things are going to get much worse.

Now comes Elizabeth Warren and her Woke naming commission to rip the fabric of our country apart.

Warren's legislation in the wake of the Floyd riots is like the Communist cultural purges of the past century or something out of Nazi Germany against the Jews.

It has falsified or erased a substantial part of American history to humiliate political rivals in the red state South from where 44% of our military is recruited.¹

Legendary Southern soldiers like Alvin York and Audie Murphy are not welcome today in Warren and Biden's military that discriminates based on skin color and sexual orientation, uses drag queens for recruiting, puts men in women's barracks, is committed to racist Critical Race Theory, and spent millions upon millions planting a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion bureaucracy in the military.

See "'Once In A Generation Crisis': Vets Blame Biden's Focus on Woke Priorities for Low Military Recruitment Numbers, Biden's Pentagon has pumped around $114 million into diversity, equity, and inclusion programs," Washington Free Beacon, March 28, 2023.

Recruits and their parents know that if you don't check the right Diversity, Equity and Inclusion boxes you can be denied opportunity. Who in his right mind would join an organization like that or suggest that their precious children join?

DEI is racist and breeds mediocrity.

Representative Jim Banks (R-Ind.), who got an amendment into the House version of the FY 2024 NDAA requiring merit over DEI said:

America's military became the greatest fighting force in the history of the world by promoting excellence, embracing colorblind principles, and attracting our nation's best and brightest . . . The Biden DoD's indefensible race and gender-based treatment of servicemembers is making our military weaker and our nation less safe. Anti-woke legislators should continue to roll back the Biden administration's radical attempts to deny Americans' equal protection under the law.²

The Defense Department started pressuring military leaders to adopt racist DEI immediately after Biden was inaugurated.

For context, diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives (often abbreviated to DEI) promote a divisive and poisonous ideology that's dismissive of merit and discriminates based on characteristics such as skin color and sexual orientation. Individuals who qualify for a certain position due to their merits but don't meet the discriminating entity's goal of being more "diverse" are passed over in favor of those who meet the preferred identitarian standards.³

That's why today's military leaders are incapable of solving recruiting problems. Many are mediocre people picked based on DEI and not merit. It is this way throughout Biden's administration. Remember the Afghanistan withdrawal when we lost 11 Marines, a Navy Hospital Corpsman and a Soldier, saw people falling out of the sky off fleeing aircraft, left Americans behind, and gave the Taliban billions of dollars of the most sophisticated weaponry on the planet.

U.S. Army Secretary Christine E. Wormuth and others have said Woke ideology has nothing to do with the recruiting crisis because they supposedly asked potential recruits if it did, and recruits said no.

In spite of examples of extreme public revulsion to Wokeness such as Bud Light and Target, Wormuth and her ilk are blind as a bat, or required to be blind by the head of the rotting fish.

It is racist Wokeness that is destroying goodwill and traditions that have long supported our military, and it can't be ignored or covered up forever by the corrupt news media or White House.

It will eventually damage the military so much it will cause a panic and real trouble. Missing recruiting goals by 25% is bad but wait until it is 40%. Wokeness and DEI have to be culled out of the military 100% and now.

Rep. Banks gave the Secretary of Defense until late 2024 to come up with a plan replacing racist Diversity, Equity and Inclusion with merit. That is way too long. He should have demanded the plan be in place in January, 2024.

Law suits should be filed over this immediately because DEI in the military and everywhere else in society is clearly racist discrimination that is illegal. I thought the Civil Rights Movement was supposed to get rid of all that.

The Wall Street Journal article above has a subtitle: "Pentagon scrambles to retain the main pipeline for new service members as disillusioned families steer young people away."

The children of military families make up the majority of new recruits in the U.S. military. That pipeline is now under threat, which is bad news for the Pentagon’s already acute recruitment problems, as well as America’s military readiness.
“Influencers are not telling them to go into the military,” said Adm. Mike Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in an interview. “Moms and dads, uncles, coaches and pastors don’t see it as a good choice.”⁴

Already military personnel serving today are under extra stress taking up the slack from lack of recruiting. See Army Times article "Soldiers under 'enormous strain,' warns Army's top enlisted leader" by James Clark, May 12, 2023.

This is not fair and puts them in danger, and is another deterrent to recruiting. The WSJ article continues:

“I’ve been studying the recruiting market for about 15 years, and we’ve never seen a condition quite like this,” said a senior Defense Department official.
The U.S. Army in 2022 had its toughest recruiting year since the advent of the all-volunteer military in 1973 and missed its goal by 25%. This year, it expects to end up about 15,000 short of its target of 65,000 recruits.
The Navy expects to fall short by as many as 10,000 of its goal of nearly 38,000 recruits this year, and the Air Force has said it is anticipating coming in at 3,000 below its goal of nearly 27,000. The Marine Corps met its target last year of sending 33,000 to boot camp, and expects to meet its goals this year, but its leaders described recruitment as challenging.
Only 9% of young people ages 16-21 said last year they would consider military service, down from 13% before the pandemic, according to Pentagon data.⁵

One of the reasons only 9% of young people are willing to serve is because of the constant hatred of America and our history pushed by the left.

Mike Pompeo, former secretary of state under President Trump, talks about Woke policies in the military:

'How can we ask young men and women who have decided to risk their lives for America, even die for America, to affirm that our country is inherently racist?' . . . 'How can we ask them to view their brothers and sisters in arms through the narrow prisms of race or gender? The clear and obvious answer is that we cannot - not without putting their lives at risk on the battlefield. A woke military is a weak military.'⁶

Pompeo also said in a Fox News article last summer:

Under the Biden administration, warfighting doctrines are being replaced - even at the training level - with doctrines of diversity, equity and inclusion.⁷

Many veterans will no longer encourage anybody, much less sons and daughters, to join the military:

When Marine Corps Reserve Col. Matthew F. Amidon, director of veterans and military families at the George W. Bush Institute, wrote a commentary urging veterans to help during the recruiting crisis by recommending military service to their kids and other young people, Military Times was inundated with hundreds of emails from veterans saying they would do no such thing.
Their reasons varied, but most said wokeness is to blame. They accused the military of becoming so "political," or such a "social experiment," that even proud veterans wouldn't recommend service.
'I'll be blunt. I wouldn't encourage anyone to join today's armed forces and I discouraged both of my sons from considering serving,' wrote Peter Demas, who described himself as a third-generation veteran. 'America's military leaders have sold out the Services for their own advancement and reflect all the poorest qualities of civilian 'leadership' from whom they accepted thirty pieces of silver; instead of being the nation's repository of integrity and moral courage, they have become more political than the political animals they grovel before.'⁸

As I said, with Wokeness, all you get is mediocrity that is incapable of even seeing problems much less solving them.

Army Secretary Wormuth is working on a sweeping "recruiting overhaul."

She declined to provide details but said a key element will be to coordinate with veterans’ groups. “Right now we are not in a comprehensive, structured way leveraging our relationships with veterans organizations,” Wormuth said.⁹

She contradicts herself by saying she wants to call on veteran groups to help with recruiting while at the same time saying she does not want to depend on military families too much because that might create a "'warrior caste'":

Her plans seek to draw in people who have no real connection to the military and to broaden the appeal of service.¹⁰

Good luck with that. Our military is not a "diversity" experiment.

Some 80% of people who join the military come from military families. How is she going to replace them with "people who have no real connection to the military"?

This is the kind of incompetence you get from the Woke. How about culling racist Woke programs out of the military so that good people will know they can advance based on merit and not be held back by a different skin color because Diversity, Equity and Inclusion calls for it.

To do as Elizabeth Warren and the naming commission suggest and discriminate against your greatest pool of recruits - Southerners - who are enthusiastic for military service and have proven themselves outstanding throughout history, in favor of a Woke social experiment, is idiotic. No wonder they can't recruit.

This is how the Army met its recruiting goals in the past:

It did so by relying heavily on veterans and military families to develop the next generation of recruits, especially in the region known in the military as the “Southern Smile,” a curving region from the mid-Atlantic and down across the southern U.S.¹¹ (bold emphasis added)

The naming commission recommendation to demolish the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery will add substantially to our recruiting crisis.

The Confederate Memorial and names on the Ranger Memorial at former Fort Benning, should not even be in the remit of the naming commission as they claim. The Confederate Memorial commemorates the reconciliation of the United States of America after a war in which 750,000 died and a million were maimed.

The names on the Ranger Memorial represent timeless American valor, patriotism and sacrifice.

The theme of reconciliation symbolized by the Confederate Memorial is irrefutable and beyond the shadow of a doubt. It is not an opinion. Arlington National Cemetery itself said it repeatedly in multiple places in its application for its Historic District to be on the National Register of Historic Places in 2014.

It was conceived by a Union soldier, later president, William McKinley, after enthusiastic Southern participation in the Spanish American War. About the 518 Confederate graves in concentric circles emanating out from the magnificent Confederate monument, McKinley said:

. . . every soldier's grave made during our unfortunate civil war is a tribute to American valor . . . And the time has now come . . . when in the spirit of fraternity we should share in the care of the graves of the Confederate soldiers . . . The cordial feeling now happily existing between the North and South prompts this gracious act and if it needed further justification it is found in the gallant loyalty to the Union and the flag so conspicuously shown in this year just passed by the sons and grandsons of those heroic dead.

Several other presidents directly participated in the creation of the Confederate Memorial such as William Howard Taft who spoke at a UDC ceremony the evening the cornerstone was laid, and Woodrow Wilson who spoke at the dedication June 4, 1914. Theodore Roosevelt sent the first annual memorial wreath. Warren G. Harding sent a message of condolence to the funeral of sculptor Moses Ezekiel. Veterans North and South enthusiastically supported the Confederate Memorial and spoke.

A hundred page book of all the participants, speeches and history was published in 1914 by the UDC and is available on Amazon, but Elizabeth Warren and the naming commission want to erase all that. The title is: History of the Arlington Confederate Monument, by Hilary A. Herbert, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Arlington Confederate Monument Association. It is available in hardback or softcover.

Remember, those were the days of the 50th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg and the famous handshakes across the wall by the old Union and Confederate veterans.

Every president starting with Teddy Roosevelt, as stated, and including Barack Obama, sent an annual wreath to the Confederate Memorial.

Barack Obama and the others were certainly not commemorating the Confederacy as required by Elizabeth Warren's legislation for the naming commission to have any say.

They were commemorating the reconciliation and reunification of the United States of America. Neither names on the Ranger Memorial, nor the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial, should be within the remit of the naming commission as it claims.

Demolishing the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial, if it was falsely or incorrectly claimed to be within the remit of the naming commission, has to be illegal and should be the subject of another law suit.

There is also a serious issue of truthfulness with the naming commission's report to Congress and Secretary of Defense Austin concerning the Confederate Memorial.

I doubt if Austin would have approved demolishing a magnificent 109 year old monument to reconciliation in our nation's most sacred burial ground if he had been given the complete history.

On page 162 of Robert E. Lee and Me, Seidule writes:

Of the thousands of monuments around the country to the Confederacy, the one in Arlington National Cemetery angers me the most. Every year, the commander in chief sends a wreath, ensuring the Confederate monument receives all the prestige of the U.S. government. That's why it riles me so much. . . .¹²

Seidule then admits that the Confederate Memorial stands for reconciliation:

I know both political parties and white citizens in the North and South brought the country back together after the tremendous bloodletting and destruction of the Civil War. The posts named for Confederate officers during World War I also served to knit white America back together as it fought a common foe. And it worked, but we must recognize that reconciliation came at a steep and horrifying cost. African Americans paid the price with lynching, Jim Crow segregation, and the loss of the franchise. The price for white reconciliation remains far too high. (Bold emphasis added.)¹³

That is an absurd statement, to say that our country should not have come back together in peace, love and patriotism, but that is a subject for another day.

Please see my white paper, "The Reconciliation of North and South after the War Between the States as symbolized by the Confederate Memorial "New South" in Arlington National Cemetery" in Defend Arlington's book of white papers:

Arguments Against Naming Commission Recommendation RE: Arlington National Cemetery Confederate Memorial

A collection of white papers, articles, testimony, and the Presidential Monument dedication speech.

There is a link below to the entire book in PDF flip-book format.

Elizabeth Warren and her naming commission want to dishonor "those heroic dead," whom McKinley spoke about, which also dishonors their descendants who have spilled oceans of Southern blood on battlefields across the globe for our great country.

Maybe Southern veterans should send Elizabeth Warren, the naming commission, Secretay of Defense Austin and Army Secretary Wormuth letters, and copy President Trump, Ron DeSantis, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, and Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Mike Rogers.

Elizabeth Warren and her naming commission also dishonor over 15 states on whose soil "those heroic dead" were born, nurtured and grew to manhood:

Georgia

Tennessee

Virginia

North Carolina

Maryland

South Carolina

Florida

Alabama

Mississippi

Arkansas

Missouri

Nevada

Texas

Louisiana

Iowa

Numerous Unknown

Please see my article: List of the 518 Confederate Burials in Arlington National Cemetery, Concentric circles of graves extend out from the magnificent Confederate Monument . . .

Article includes name, rank, unit info., place of birth and death, infantry, cavalry, or artillery, when known. These are all the names in Section 16 of Arlington National Cemetery, mostly men, some women family members.

Elizabeth Warren and her naming commission would have all those honored dead facing a mangled shaft that was once a monument, about whose creator art scholar Michael Robert Patterson said:

[N]o sculptor, as far as known, has ever, in any one memorial told as much history as has Ezekiel in his monument at Arlington; and every human figure in it, as well as every symbol, is in and of itself a work of art.

The above quote comes from a white paper by the foremost national authority on Confederate and Union monuments, Ernest E. Blevins, entitled "Headstone of the Confederate States: Moses Ezekiel's Arlington Confederate Monument, Symbolism, Meaning, National Register Eligibility, and Potential Adverse Effects to Alternations or Removal." It is included in Defend Arlington's book of white papers. There is a link below.

Blevins discusses the "monument symbology" that "depicts the South's mourning and the war's losses."

I might again remind Elizabeth Warren and her Woke naming commission that 750,000 died in the War Between the States and over a million were maimed out of a national population of 31 million.

James McPherson said about the South's losses:

the overall mortality rate for the South exceeded that of any country in World War I and that of all but the region between the Rhine and the Volga in World War II."¹⁴

The Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery reunited our country and opened a pipeline of patriotic Southerners to serve with relish in our military.

Until the rise of Wokeness and Elizabeth Warren's destruction and falsification of Southern history, we had no recruiting crisis and our military was the best in all of history.

The recruiting crisis can no longer be tolerated:

U.S. recruiting shortfalls represent a long-term problem that, if not resolved, would compel the military to reduce its force size. With America embarking on a new era of great-power competition with China and Russia, that problem has become more serious. ¹⁵

Let me reiterate how the Army met its recruiting goals in the past:

It did so by relying heavily on veterans and military families to develop the next generation of recruits, especially in the region known in the military as the “Southern Smile,” a curving region from the mid-Atlantic and down across the southern U.S.¹⁶ (bold emphasis added)

Once the pipelines of recruits from families and veterans, and traditions such as the South's are destroyed, the country comes apart. That's why it's call "tearing the fabric of our country."

It can't be fixed quickly, especially when half the population does not even trust our elections, and for good reasons.

We need champions who will call attention to the naming commission's disgraceful recommendation to remove names from the Ranger Memorial at former Fort Benning, and demolish the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

President Trump, Ron DeSantis, Republicans in Congress, state attorneys general, governors, especially of the 15 states represented among the 518 Southern graves in concentric circles emanating out from the Confederate Monument in Arlington National Cemetery, and others who realize the threat that Wokeness has caused to our military, PLEASE STAND UP for the Rangers and for Arlington National Cemetery.

The naming commission's recommendation will desecrate Arlington National Cemetery for all time.

You don't have to love the Confederacy to be outraged with the idea of demolishing 109 year old historic monuments in cemeteries. Americans don't do things like that. The Taliban and ISIS do but we don't.

The Confederate Reconciliation Memorial is one of the most magnificent on earth.

Esteemed British art critic and historian, Alexander Adams, writes that "four soldiers are buried at its base" and "include Civil War Soldier and sculptor Corporal Moses Ezekiel . . . " therefore "The [Confederate] Memorial is an actual grave marker, marking the burial site of dead soldiers, and is located in the National Cemetery, making it a functional or symbolic grave marker. It is therefore outside the remit of the Naming Commission."¹⁷

About its artistic significance, Adams writes:

Having viewed a large amount of public statuary from the beaux-arts era (1850-1914), it is my professional opinion that the Memorial is a serious, iconographically complex and technically accomplished piece of art. It my view, it is a handsome sculpture and an entirely appropriate funerary monument. I consider it an internationally significant piece of art of its type and era. Any nation should be proud to host such a magnanimous and dignified monument."¹⁸

Adams also notes that:

[I]t is rare for a nation to mark the sacrifices and loses of the losing side in a civil war. This makes the Memorial internationally significant, as an example of the exceptional history of the USA and the efforts to reconcile the sides after the Civil War. It shows black and white soldiers working together, overturning expectations and putting [on] the record the complexity of historical fact, which it is not our generation's place to suppress.¹⁹

The reason reconciliation was desired by both sides is because both knew the issues of States Rights and secession, on which the Founding Fathers had set up the country, versus an all-powerful central government, as the North was fighting for, were undecided before the war.

President Eisenhower said it best in a letter August 9, 1960 to Dr. Leon Scott defending why he had a picture of Robert E. Lee on his office wall in the White House the whole time he was president. Eisenhower wrote:

Dear Dr. Scott:
Respecting your August 1 inquiry calling attention to my often expressed admiration for General Robert E. Lee, I would say, first, that we need to understand that at the time of the War between the States the issue of secession had remained unresolved for more than 70 years. Men of probity, character, public standing and unquestioned loyalty, both North and South, had disagreed over this issue as a matter of principle from the day our Constitution was adopted.
General Robert E. Lee was, in my estimation, one of the supremely gifted men produced by our Nation. He believed unswervingly in the Constitutional validity of his cause which until 1865 was still an arguable question in America; he was a poised and inspiring leader, true to the high trust reposed in him by millions of his fellow citizens; he was thoughtful yet demanding of his officers and men, forbearing with captured enemies but ingenious, unrelenting and personally courageous in battle, and never disheartened by a reverse or obstacle. Through all his many trials, he remained selfless almost to a fault and unfailing in his faith in God. Taken altogether, he was noble as a leader and as a man, and unsullied as I read the pages of our history.
From deep conviction, I simply say this: a nation of men of Lee's caliber would be unconquerable in spirit and soul. Indeed, to the degree that present-day American youth will strive to emulate his rare qualities, including his devotion to this land as revealed in his painstaking efforts to help heal the Nation's wounds once the bitter struggle was over, will be strengthened and our love of freedom sustained.
Such are the reasons that I proudly display the picture of this great American on my office wall.
Sincerely,
Dwight D. Eisenhower ²⁰

If Congress will IMMEDIATELY cull out of our military the racist Diversity, Equity and Inclusion bureaucracy that Biden has embedded along with all Woke programs so that our military is unquestionably back to being based 100% on merit, we can stop the damage to important veteran and family pipelines and traditions that serve our military, and, before Biden, made it the greatest in the history of the world.

We should also repeal Elizabeth Warren's history-falsifying and destroying legislation that insults and dishonors the South from where 44% of our military is recruited.

As Ty Seidule admitted, even the Confederate base names in the South were done out of reconciliation and not commemoration of the Confederacy as required by Warren's legislation therefore they should be changed back.

Ron DeSantis and Mike Pence suggested changing Fort Bragg back to Fort Bragg. ALL of the bases should be changed back because Elizabeth Warren's legislation is a Communist-style falsification of history so she can pretend she has virtue. It is worthless legislation and a waste of money.

We must restore names to the Ranger Memorial at former Fort Benning and Congress should formally apologize to the families who were victims of Elizabeth Warren and the misguided naming commission.

Links to Important Resources

Shop Now

View testimony which starts at 1:38:59.

Here is a link to Defend Arlington's donation page that states:

CHIP IN FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY MEMORIAL LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND. You can also pay with Zelle. Send to

DefendArlington@gmail.com.

Please Donate Now -- THANK YOU!

Click Here to Donate AND Share on Facebook, et al.

Defend Arlington update with link to February 28, 2023 Tucker Carlson interview with Christopher Bedford on the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington update, Tucker Carlson segment on YouTube

Defend Arlington's 385 Page Book of White Papers

Here is a link to an informative nine minute video, "The Arlington Confederate Monument," produced by the Abbeville Institute.

The Arlington Confederate Monument

PDF White Papers from Defend Arlington

Click Here for Bode Lang's excellent video

Here is a link to an excellent video of a Georgia lady calling out Elizabeth Warren and her Massachusetts hypocrisy.

Click Here for Georgia Lady Teaching Elizabeth Warren a Lesson

Here are important Southern Legal Resource Center links. SLRC mailing address is: Southern Legal Resource Center, 90 Church St., Black Mountain, NC 28711-3365.

Click Here to donate to the Southern Legal Resource Center

Click Here to follow on Facebook

Click Here to go to their website

¹ Ben Kesling, "The Military Recruiting Crisis: Even Veterans Don’t Want Their Families to Join,

² Shawn Fleetwood, June 21, 2023, "House Committee Advances Amendment Restoring Meritocracy to Military Personnel Decisions," https://thefederalist.com/2023/06/21/house-committee-advances-amendment-restoring-meritocracy-to-military-personnel-decisions/, accessed 6-22-23.

³ Ibid.

⁴ Ben Kesling, "The Military Recruiting Crisis: Even Veterans Don’t Want Their Families to Join,

⁵ Ibid.

⁶ Mike Pompeo in Meghann Myers, "Is the military too 'woke' to recruit?", October 13, 2022, https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2022/10/13/is-the-military-too-woke-to-recruit/, accessed 1-24-23.

⁷ Quoted from the Reagan Institute Defense Survey in Ben Wolfgang article, "The war over 'woke': Republicans gear up to take aim at controversial Pentagon social policies, https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/dec/27/war-over-woke-republicans-gear-take-aim-controvers, accessed 12-27-22.

⁸ Meghann Myers, "Is the military too 'woke' to recruit?", October 13, 2022, https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2022/10/13/is-the-military-too-woke-to-recruit/, accessed 1-24-23.

⁹ Ibid.

¹⁰ Ibid.

¹¹ Ben Kesling, "The Military Recruiting Crisis: Even Veterans Don’t Want Their Families to Join,

¹² Ty Seidule, Robert E. Lee and Me, A Southerner's Reckoning with the Myth of the Lost Cause (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2020), 162.

¹³ Ibid.

¹⁴ James McPherson, quoted in Drew Gilpin Faust, This Republic of Suffering, Death and the American Civil War (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008), xii.

¹⁵ Ben Kesling, "The Military Recruiting Crisis: Even Veterans Don’t Want Their Families to Join,

¹⁶ Ibid.

¹⁷ Alexander Adams, "Testimony regarding Arlington National Cemetery Confederate Memorial submitted to the Advisory Committee on Arlington National Cemetery Open Secession, 7-8 November 2022." Adams's source is Arlington National Cemetery's National Register of Historic Places Registration Form for the Historic District received by the National Park Service February 24, 2014, mentioned above. It was approved for the property's entry onto the National Register of Historic Places April 11, 2014. Adams's full testimony is in Defend Arlington's book of white papers by art and history experts, a link to the PDF flip-book is below.

¹⁸ Ibid.

¹⁹ Ibid.

²⁰ Dwight D. Eisenhower letter, August 9, 1960, to Leon W. Scott, in "Dwight D. Eisenhower in Defense of Robert E. Lee," August 10, 2014, Mathew W. Lively, https://www.civilwarprofiles.com/dwight-d-eisenhower-in-defense-of-robert-e-lee/, accessed 5-3-20

An open letter to Brigadier General Joseph S. Stringham, U.S. Army, ret, Chairman, National Ranger Memorial Foundation

Posted on June 1, 2023June 1, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | No Comments

An open letter to Brigadier General Joseph S. Stringham, U.S. Army, ret, Chairman, National Ranger Memorial Foundation

Ranger Memorial, Fort Benning, Georgia.

Dear BG Stringham,

A lot of good people are outraged at the desecration of the Ranger Memorial at Fort Benning, Georgia as a result of Elizabeth Warren's legislation in the 2021 NDAA requiring the removal of all commemoration of the Southern Confederate States of America from DOD assets, despite over 44% of our military being recruited in the South.

The South has always been fertile ground for patriotism and military service, which go back to our Revolutionary and Confederate heritage of bravery and valor.

In your recent letter to the National Ranger Memorial Foundation you wrote of the directive from Col. Colin Mahle, Garrison Commander of Fort Benning, for the Foundation to "remove specific names from our RANGER Monument/Memorial. These names are Col. John S Mosby 1992 RHOIF, Mosby memorial paver, Quantrill memorial paver, George Bowman memorial paver with reference to BG Morgan and Jackson Bowman paver with reference to BG Morgan."

You stated that:

While all of this is wrapped in the legal promulgation of a law passed by the Pelosi 117th Congress, importantly the action directed at me is an interpretation of said law by a Naming Committee established by the DOD and the OSECARMY management and passed down to installation level management. This is the case with Ft Benning and our RANGER Memorial.
Implementation of dramatic / radical edicts and shifts in policy at issue here are frequently accompanied by inaccuracies, (stupid) interpretations, injustices to survivors and a strong political slant offensive to substantial sectors of society. The deceased named in this directive, the Mosby family and the Bowen family in particular, are victims of woefully targeted legislation enacted by the Pelosi, WOKE, 117th Congress. Interpretations of this legislation have received the slavish obedience by both civilian and military management at the national level as passed down, apparently without verification, to our installations. . . .

Warren, who lied about her ethnicity for years to game the affirmative action system, has ripped the fabric of our nation apart for what she thinks is a political advantage. Her legislation falsifies and erases history.

The thing I am writing you about is that the Ranger Memorial is not the only thing being degraded by Warren's legislation.

Arlington National Cemetery itself is about to be desecrated for all time by the same legislation.

The same naming commission that you state is operating without verification of its interpretations, recommended demolishing the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

That memorial is a world class work of art surrounded by over 500 Southern graves in concentric circles out from the magnificent monument. The sculptor, Moses Ezekiel, a Jewish VMI Confederate soldier and acclaimed artist, is buried at its base along with two other Confederate soldiers and a Confederate sailor.

The Confederate Memorial should not be in the naming commission's remit because it does not commemorate the Confederacy in any way. It commemorates the reconciliation of the United States of America after a bloody war in which 750,000 died and over a million were maimed.

Reconciliation is clearly the symbolism and theme of the Confederate Memorial. It would not even be in Arlington National Cemetery if not for the strong desire of the United States government, Congress, presidents and both Union and Confederate veterans to welcome Southerners back into the country in a real way.

Arlington National Cemetery itself in its 2014 application for its Historic District to be on the National Register of Historic Places states in several places that RECONCILIATION is what the Confederate Memorial stands for.

Even naming commission vice chair, Ty Seidule, who hates the Confederate Memorial in Arlington, admits the reconciliation theme and wrote about it in his book, Robert E. Lee and Me, though he left that critical information out of the naming commission's report to Congress, thus making that report, shall we say, less than the truth.

On page 162 of Robert E. Lee and Me, Seidule writes:

Of the thousands of monuments around the country to the Confederacy, the one in Arlington National Cemetery angers me the most. Every year, the commander in chief sends a wreath, ensuring the Confederate monument receives all the prestige of the U.S. government. That's why it riles me so much. . . .

Seidule then admits that the Confederate Memorial stands for reconciliation:

I know both political parties and white citizens in the North and South brought the country back together after the tremendous bloodletting and destruction of the Civil War. The posts named for Confederate officers during World War I also served to knit white America back together as it fought a common foe. And it worked, but we must recognize that reconciliation came at a steep and horrifying cost. African Americans paid the price with lynching, Jim Crow segregation, and the loss of the franchise. The price for white reconciliation remains far too high. (Bold emphasis added.)

Truth be known, the base names shouldn't have been changed either, causing offense "to substantial sectors of society" as you said, and wasting over a hundred million dollars.

The Southern bases were so named, as Seidule admits, for the reconciliation of the United States of America, and it worked, as he also said. But now that history will be erased.

I do not believe the names on the Ranger Memorial that you have been directed to remove or cover, are within the naming commission's remit. Those names are there to pay tribute to American valor and to the United States of America, not the CSA.

The naming commission recommendations to demolish things that, arguable, are not in their remit, are illegal, and, regardless, are immoral.

There are other subjective statements in the naming commission's write-up on the Confederate Memorial that mirror leftist politics and are false but consider these irrefutable facts on the reconciliation theme: The naming commission did not mention that three presidents had been actively involved with the creation of the Confederate Memorial, which was the brainchild of Union soldier and later president, William McKinley, who said:

. . . every soldier's grave made during our unfortunate civil war is a tribute to American valor . . . And the time has now come . . . when in the spirit of fraternity we should share in the care of the graves of the Confederate soldiers . . . The cordial feeling now happily existing between the North and South prompts this gracious act and if it needed further justification it is found in the gallant loyalty to the Union and the flag so conspicuously shown in this year just passed by the sons and grandsons of those heroic dead.

President William Howard Taft gave a well-received speech the evening of the laying of the cornerstone at a UDC ceremony.

President Woodrow Wilson gave the dedication address at the Confederate Memorial June 4, 1914, and both Union and Confederate veterans spoke lovingly of the monument and our reconciled, reunified nation.

The year before had been the famous handshakes across the wall by the old Union and Confederate gentlemen for the 50th Anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg.

President Teddy Roosevelt spoke highly of the Confederate monument.

President Warren G. Harding sent a message of respect and admiration that was read at sculptor Moses Ezekiel's funeral.

Each year, every president sent an annual wreath to the Confederate Memorial including Barack Obama.

Those dozens of presidents over the past century were not commemorating the Confederacy, they were commemorating the reconciliation of the United States of America, yet none of that was mentioned by the naming commission in their less-than-truthful report.

The mistakes the naming commission made about the names on the Ranger Memorial, and the less-than-truthful report to Congress, must be addressed and both the Ranger Memorial and Confederate Memorial protected.

To demolish the Confederate Memorial would not only destroy a world class work of art, it would leave a mangled shaft in Arlington National Cemetery surrounded by over 500 Southern graves that are there to symbolize reconciliation as President McKinley said. Every one of them is a tribute to American valor.

Demolishing the Confederate Memorial would dishonor Arlington National Cemetery for all time.

It is beneath the dignity of the United States of America to destroy historic monuments in cemeteries, or take names off of memorials.

I am asking you, BG Stringham, with all the resptect I can muster, to please make the fight to save the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial YOUR fight too, and the fight of all our Rangers. Rangers Lead the Way!

The Woke must be made to understand that American Valor and Honor are steadfast and forever, and do not blow with Woke political winds.

An organization, Defend Arlington, has a law suit to stop the demolition of the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery. We have to raise money constantly to maintain it because we are just average patriotic Americans from all over the country trying to address an outrage.

We have done a tremendous amount so far. We have published an outstanding book full of history and evaluation of the Confederate monument by distinguished historians and art critics. We have been delivering copies to members of Congress, especially on the House Armed Services Committee. I can get you a copy.

It is available online as a flip-book PDF. There is a link below.

I'm sure you know Hon. Mike Rogers, Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, whose Third Congressional District is not that far from you in Alabama and includes Fort Benning. He should be a powerful ally in the fight for the Ranger Memorial and the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial.

In your recent letter to the members of the National Ranger Memorial Foundation, in which you discussed the outrage of having to remove names from the Ranger Memorial, you stated: "This is not the last word."

Please make the fight to stop the desecration of Arlington National Cemetery also your fight and the Rangers' fight! It is the same fight, same bad legislation, same "politicized" unhistorical interpretations of history.

I do not have your email address so if someone could help get this Open Letter to you, I would be most appreciative.

Thank you for your distinguished service to our country, and God Bless America!

Gene Kizer, Jr.
Charleston, South Carolina
www.CharlestonAthenaeumPress.com

Links to Important Resources

Shop Now

View testimony which starts at 1:38:59.

Here is a link to Defend Arlington's donation page that states:

CHIP IN FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY MEMORIAL LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND. You can also pay with Zelle. Send to

DefendArlington@gmail.com.

Please Donate Now -- THANK YOU!

Click Here to Donate AND Share on Facebook, et al.

Defend Arlington update with link to February 28, 2023 Tucker Carlson interview with Christopher Bedford on the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington update, Tucker Carlson segment on YouTube

Defend Arlington's 385 Page Book of White Papers

Here is a link to an informative nine minute video, "The Arlington Confederate Monument," produced by the Abbeville Institute.

The Arlington Confederate Monument

PDF White Papers from Defend Arlington

Click Here for Bode Lang's excellent video

Here is a link to an excellent video of a Georgia lady calling out Elizabeth Warren and her Massachusetts hypocrisy.

Click Here for Georgia Lady Teaching Elizabeth Warren a Lesson

Here are important Southern Legal Resource Center links. SLRC mailing address is: Southern Legal Resource Center, 90 Church St., Black Mountain, NC 28711-3365.

Click Here to donate to the Southern Legal Resource Center

Click Here to follow on Facebook

Click Here to go to their website

Confederate names removed from the Ranger Memorial

Posted on May 27, 2023May 27, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | 4 Comments

Fort Benning’s Col. Colin Mahle proceeded with recommendations from the Congressionally-mandated Naming Commission to cover or remove certain names on the Ranger Memorial associated with the Confederacy, even though they served the United States honorably, retired Brig. Gen. Joseph Stringham, Chairman of the National Ranger Memorial Foundation, wrote in a letter on April 28. Not only did the [naming] commission dishonor the Rangers commemorated, but hiding the names denies free expression of those who contributed to the memorial . . .

Confederate names removed from the Ranger Memorial

Elizabeth Warren's renaming legislation has shredded the fabric of our country

Destroying the 109 year old Confederate Memorial in Arlington is next

Over 44% of our military has traditionally been recruited in the South

But to serve today, Southerners have to accept Warren's LIE that they have traitor blood flowing through their veins

The full color tab is 2⅜ inches (6.03 cm) long, 11/16 inch (1.75 cm) wide, with a ⅛ inch (0.32 cm) yellow border and the word "RANGER" inscribed in yellow letters 5/16 inch (0.79 cm) high.

Black marble slab at the Ranger Memorial, Fort Benning, Georgia.

Ranger Creed, courtesy Jay France.

CPT Adam Snyder was a member of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point's 2004 graduating class. CPT Snyder died Dec. 5, 2007, in Balad, Iraq.

[Publisher's Note, by Gene Kizer, Jr. - In 'Covers Up History': Retired Army Rangers Hammer The Pentagon For Purging Confederates From The Ranger Memorial,ⁱ Micaela Burrow of the Daily Caller News Foundation writes:

    The U.S. Army’s order to scrub names on the Ranger Memorial thought to be associated with the Confederacy is an affront to the legacy of the Rangers and free speech, retired U.S. Rangers told The Daily Caller News Foundation.
    Fort Benning’s commander proceeded with recommendations from a Pentagon commission to cover or remove certain names, even though they were wrongly identified as offensive, according to National Ranger Memorial Foundation chairman Brig. Gen. Joseph Stringham.
    “I’ve paid for my right to free speech in blood and agony. Others paid a lot more,” retired Ranger 1st Lt. Richard Fincher told the DCNF.

Free speech does not matter to Elizabeth Warren and her Woke naming commission with its erasure of history and false report to Congress.

The dishonoring of the Ranger Memorial is the most recent outrage but the coveted goal of naming commission vice chair Ty Seidule is the demolition of the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

It is hard to imagine what's in the heart of a person that could demolish a magnificent 109 year old monument surrounded by 500 graves in concentric circles symbolizing the reunification of our country after a war in which 750,000 died and over a million were maimed, but here is what Seidule wrote on page 162 of his hate screed Robert E. Lee and Me:

Of the thousands of monuments around the country to the Confederacy, the one in Arlington National Cemetery angers me the most. Every year, the commander in chief sends a wreath, ensuring the Confederate monument receives all the prestige of the U.S. government. That's why it riles me so much. . . .

Seidule then admits that the Confederate Memorial stands for reconciliation but he leaves that critical fact out of the naming commission's report to Congress, thus he made the report false by the omission of critical facts he knew well. He continues on page 162 of Robert E. Lee and Me:

I know both political parties and white citizens in the North and South brought the country back together after the tremendous bloodletting and destruction of the Civil War. The posts named for Confederate officers during World War I also served to knit white America back together as it fought a common foe. And it worked, but we must recognize that reconciliation came at a steep and horrifying cost. African Americans paid the price with lynching, Jim Crow segregation, and the loss of the franchise. The price for white reconciliation remains far too high. (Bold emphasis added.)

In the past, military service was revered in the South where 44.1% of the U.S. Military was recruited but Seidule's clear message is: Southerners you are not welcome in the military today unless you agree to a LIE, that your blood is the blood of traitors.

Warren's legislation, which could have been stopped by then Republican chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Jim Inhofe, is the epitome of what Orwell warned about in 1984 when he wrote:

Who controls the past controls the future: Who controls the present controls the past.

But Inhofe lied to President Trump when he promised to stop Warren. I am a Republican but the national Republican Party, except for President Trump and a few others, is the most worthless cowardly stupid party in American history that NEVER stands up for its voters.

Where is Tom Cotton? Josh Hawley? Nancy Mace? Joe Wilson? Do they agree with Elizabeth Warren that their voters have traitor blood in them?

The Southern states with their Confederate history are mostly Red States, and the Northern (Union) states of Elizabeth Warren and naming commission historian, Connor Williams, are mostly Blue States.

This is 100% politics and not history.

Warren, Williams and Seidule don't want you to know, or they don't know themselves, that the Blue States brought all the slaves here shackled on their backs in vomit and feces for months through the Middle Passage for Yankee money.

Do you think virtue signaling Elizabeth Warren cares that New York and her Boston were the largest slave trading ports on the planet during the War Between the States, some 54 years after the slave trade was outlawed by the U.S. Constitution?

Elizabeth Warren's New Englanders brought ALL the slaves here. They built their economies on the slave trade before the Revolution then continued selling black people illegally for Yankee profit the entire antebellum period, until well after the War Between the States, because slavery was still legal in Brazil and Cuba.

The founder of Brown University, John Brown, not the infamous John Brown of Harpers Ferry but John Brown, American patriot, of Providence, Rhode Island, famously said:

[T]here was no more crime in bringing off a cargo of slaves than in bringing off a cargo of jackasses.ⁱⁱ

W. E. B. Du Bois in his famous book, The Suppression of the African Slave-Trade to the United States of America 1638-1870, writes that Boston, New York and Portland, Maine were the largest slave trading ports on earth in 1862, a year into the War Between the States:

The number of persons engaged in the slave-trade, and the amount of capital embarked in it, exceed our powers of calculation. The city of New York has been until of late [1862] the principal port of the world for this infamous commerce; although the cities of Portland and Boston are only second to her in that distinction. Slave dealers added largely to the wealth of our commercial metropolis; they contributed liberally to the treasuries of political organizations, and their bank accounts were largely depleted to carry elections in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut.

Those places were not fighting to end slavery. They were fighting for political power, money and control, just like Elizabeth Warren is today. Power, money and control are why all wars are fought.

Do you think that Elizabeth Warren even knows that there were more slave states in the Union when the war started than in the Confederacy, and that six slave states fought for the Union the entire war? West Virginia came into the Union as a slave state warmly welcomed by Abraham Lincoln just weeks after he issued the Emancipation Proclamation.

Do you think the political propagandists Warren, Williams, and Seidule know that New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia all reserved the right of secession before ratifying the United States Constitution? All the other states accepted the reserved right of secession of New York, Rhode Island and Virginia thus they had it too because all states are equal and entered the Union as equals with the exact same rights.

Our country was born from the secession of 13 colonies from the British empire. Secession was in the DNA of everybody, North and South.

You can't have freedom if there is no way you can divorce yourself from a government that becomes tyrannical.

The evidence is overwhelming of the right of secession, which is why New England threatened to do it so many times.

That Warren, Williams and Seidule do not know this, or reject it, proves they do not understand or care about American history.

They are pushing leftist political hate to the Blue States' base. Tearing down the monuments and dishonoring the patriotic history of the Red States gives them power, which is exactly why rioters in the streets destroyed monuments after George Floyd's death. They want the power that comes with being able to destroy.

President Dwight D. Eisenhower explained our history well when he defended Robert E. Lee to a dentist who had excoriated him for having a picture of Lee on his wall in the White House. Gen. Eisenhower, Supreme Allied Commander in World War II, towers over Ty Seidule in understanding American history but then Eisenhower's history is based on truth, and Seidule's is based on Woke leftist politics.

Eisenhower wrote the dentist, Dr. Leon W. Scott, August 9, 1960:

Dear Dr. Scott:
Respecting your August 1 inquiry calling attention to my often expressed admiration for General Robert E. Lee, I would say, first, that we need to understand that at the time of the War between the States the issue of secession had remained unresolved for more than 70 years. Men of probity, character, public standing and unquestioned loyalty, both North and South, had disagreed over this issue as a matter of principle from the day our Constitution was adopted.
General Robert E. Lee was, in my estimation, one of the supremely gifted men produced by our Nation. He believed unswervingly in the Constitutional validity of his cause which until 1865 was still an arguable question in America; he was a poised and inspiring leader, true to the high trust reposed in him by millions of his fellow citizens; he was thoughtful yet demanding of his officers and men, forbearing with captured enemies but ingenious, unrelenting and personally courageous in battle, and never disheartened by a reverse or obstacle. Through all his many trials, he remained selfless almost to a fault and unfailing in his faith in God. Taken altogether, he was noble as a leader and as a man, and unsullied as I read the pages of our history.
From deep conviction, I simply say this: a nation of men of Lee's caliber would be unconquerable in spirit and soul. Indeed, to the degree that present-day American youth will strive to emulate his rare qualities, including his devotion to this land as revealed in his painstaking efforts to help heal the Nation's wounds once the bitter struggle was over, will be strengthened and our love of freedom sustained.
Such are the reasons that I proudly display the picture of this great American on my office wall.
Sincerely,
Dwight D. Eisenhower ⁱⁱⁱ

After the Southern names were erased from the Ranger Memorial, "retired Rangers told the Daily Caller News Foundation the move undermines the memorial's intent to honor the contributions of Rangers throughout U.S. history."

Burrow goes on:

“It’s disgraceful. I think it’s foolish because it covers up history,” Retired Ranger 1st Lt. Richard Fincher, who served in the 101st Airborne Division and has a target stone in the memorial, told the DCNF. “Recognizing the valor and leadership of a foe does not constitute the endorsement of their cause.”

What kind of country would we be if we allow names to be taken off sacred war memorials; and we allow monuments in cemeteries to be destroyed so the Elizabeth Warrens of the world can feel virtuous?

One of the inscriptions on the Confederate Monument comes from the Bible, Isaiah 2:4: "And they shall beat their swords into ploughshares and their spears into pruning hooks."

The bigger question is, can our country survive the lies of omission of Ty Seidule and Connor Willams, and the deliberate shredding of the very fabric of our nation by Elizabeth Warren and the Republican cowards like Jim Inhofe who went along with her in the 2021 NDAA against President Trump's wishes?

If you think antebellum Americans did not believe in the right of secession then you CAN NOT KNOW American history yet Seidule and Connor Williams both state frequently that Confederates are traitors.

Apparently, neither of them know that there were no trials for treason after the war because the U.S. Government knew it would lose.

Around one-third of our country are descended from Confederate soldiers whose bravery and valor when they were invaded by the North (think about THAT!) are the very definition of those words.

Union veterans knew this and warmly welcomed Southerners back into our country. They knew our late war was over legitimate differences such as the North's desire for a powerful central government they could control with their larger population. They could then tax the rest of the country for their own benefit as Alexis de Tocqueville said would happen if one region got control of the government, and that is exactly what did happened.

One region with its larger population controlling the central government is exactly the "tyranny of the majority" the Founding Fathers warned about.

Jeffersonian Southerners were the opposite. They believe in the sovereignty of their states and they put that in the Confederate Constitution.

Southerners accepted the outcome of the war and rejoined our nation with enthusiasm, encouraged by real heroes of American history like Robert E. Lee. They had stood up and fought well for their God-given right to self-government and they were deservedly proud of it.

No people in the history of the world ever displayed more valor than Southerners despite being outnumbered four to one and outgunned 200 to one.

Yankees were well fed, well clothed, and well armed while the Confederates that Warren, Williams and Seidule all hate, were often barefoot, hungry and carrying muskets.

Southerners sacrificed everything for independence. Historian James McPherson writes:

[T]he overall mortality rate for the South exceeded that of any country in World War I and that of all but the region between the Rhine and the Volga in World War II.¹

Compare the 750,000 dead of the War Between the States out of a national population of 31.4 million, with the 419,400 dead of World War II out of a national population of 132,164,569.

Basil Gildersleeve, still known today as the greatest American classical scholar of all time, was a Confederate soldier from Charleston, South Carolina. He sums it up nicely in The Creed of the Old South, published 27 years after the war:

All that I vouch for is the feeling; . . . there was no lurking suspicion of any moral weakness in our cause. Nothing could be holier than the cause, nothing more imperative that the duty of upholding it. There were those in the South who, when they saw the issue of the war, gave up their faith in God, but not their faith in the cause.^iv

The reconciliation theme of the Confederate Memorial in Arlington is irrefutable and established by Arlington National Cemetery itself in its application for its Historic District to be on the National Register of Historic Places.

This is an undeniable fact and can not be questioned.

Ty Seidule knew it too and wrote about it in Robert E. Lee and Me yet he left it out of the naming commission's report to Congress. Why?

Because he knew that if he told the truth - that the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery surrounded by over 500 Southern graves stands 100% for reconciliation and the reunification of our country - it would not be in the naming commission's remit and he would not be able to destroy the monument to satisfy his personal hatred, and build up his Woke leftist credentials since he is now in academia.

Seidule lied and misled Congress by leaving out critical facts he knew to be true.

Elizabeth Warren's legislation has ripped the fabric of our country apart and you can not put Humpty Dumpty back together again.

Micaela Burrow writes about the naming commission's report:

The final report called for the removal of the Col. John S. Mosby from display on the Ranger Memorial, as well as “the names of all Confederates from paver stones on the Ranger Memorial Walk leading to the Ranger Memorial (including but not limited to William Quantrill, George Bowman, and Jackson Bowman).”
But, two of the Rangers noted — Mosby and Morgan — do not deserve to have their names scrubbed, Stringham said in the letter notifying Rangers of the changes.
“Implementation of dramatic/radical edicts and shifts in policy at issue here are frequently accompanied by inaccuracies, (stupid) interpretations, injustices to survivors and a strong political slant offensive to substantial sectors of society,” Stringham wrote.
For example, Brig. Gen. Daniel Morgan was wrongly identified with the Confederacy as Brig. Gen. John Hunt Morgan, according to Stringham. Daniel Morgan served on the side of the colonies during the Revolutionary War and was a hero in the Battle of the CowPens.
And while Col. Mosby made his name as a Ranger on the Confederate side, he claimed to oppose slavery and went on to support Union Gen. Ulysses S. Grant’s presidential bid and serve as consul in China, according to the National Museum of American History.
“I specifically remember being taught about the leadership and strategy of Col. Mosby, whose courage and innovation was the envy of both allies and adversaries alike. The senior Ranger [non-commissioned officer] who taught me about Mosby, and who praised his prowess as a Ranger and officer, was an African American who was raised in the deep south during segregation and who had fought in a Ranger Company in Vietnam,” Mike Simpson, who served under Stringham in the 1st Ranger Battalion from 1984 to 1988, told the DCNF.

Removing names from the Ranger Memorial and the ongoing attempt to destroy the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery smack of what the Nazis did to the Jews in the 1930s.

It is beneath the dignity of the United States of America but quite OK with the Woke trying to destroy our country.

Micaela Burrow ends with:

The Ranger Handbook contains a history section documenting major contributions of Rangers since before the Revolutionary War. Tactical innovations of both Morgan and Mosby led to the elevated position of Rangers within the Army today, the handbook says.
“Rangers throughout the force lead their formations, set the example for fellow Soldiers, and remain ready to defend the United States against its enemies,” the handbook states.
“As a young Ranger, I was taught that our Ranger history was one of the most important things about our identity as a Regiment,” Simpson told the DCNF.
But, Fort Benning leadership chose to overlook those contributions to gain notice from their superiors, according to William Thibeau, senior fellow at the Claremont Institute’s Center for the American Way of Life.
“Until this egregious whitewash of history, Rangers of the modern era stood on the shoulders of this legacy, not to blindly affirm everything, but to fulfill the Ranger Creed and the Charter to which every Army Ranger pledges his life. But now, it’s also about politics and the woke mission to erase history,” Thibeau, also an Army Ranger veteran, told the DCNF.

Please get every veteran and patriotic American you know to write Congress and their governors and attorneys general and tell them you are OUTRAGED that Elizabeth Warren and the Woke naming commission has caused names to be removed from the Ranger Memorial. Those names must be restored IMMEDIATELY.

Tell Congress and governors to get involved and STOP the ongoing efforts to demolish the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery, which would desecrate Arlington National Cemetery for all time.

Stand up and fight!

PLEASE CONTRIBUTE MONEY to Defend Arlington's litigation in defense of the Confederate Memorial. It would already be gone if it wasn't for Defend Arlington and their many allies who care about our country and its history.

The Army will file a motion to dismiss our law suit any day now so time is of the essence so we can continue paying our crack legal team.

Kirk Lyons of the Southern Legal Resource Center writes:

Check here for your State Historic Preservation Office - https://ncshpo.org/directory/. Contact Kirk D. Lyons at 828-712-2115 for a sample letter/ and or game-plan for calling them to get them involved. All these SHPOs should have been contacted by the Army regarding the removal or demolition of the Confederate Reconciliation Monument. We need to goad the SHPOs to actively get their Governor/Attorney General involved in putting pressure on the Army to include filing a lawsuit to stop removal, demolition.

Take action TODAY!

NOTES:

¹ Faust, This Republic of Suffering, xii. She cites James M. McPherson, Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002) pp. 3, 177, n. 56.

ⁱ Micaela Burrow, 'Covers Up History'" Retired Army Rangers Hammer The Pentagon For PUrging Confederates From The Ranger Memorial, May 5, 2023, https://dailycaller.com/2023/05/05/retired-rangers-warn-of-whitewashing-history-after-pentagon-scrubs-confederate-names-from-memorial, accessed 5-18-23.

ⁱⁱ Anne Farrow, Joel Lang, and Jenifer Frank, Complicity, How the North Promoted, Prolonged, and Profited from Slavery (New York: Ballantine Books, Copyright 2005 by The Hartford Courant Company), 110.

ⁱⁱⁱ Dwight D. Eisenhower letter, August 9, 1960, to Leon W. Scott, in "Dwight D. Eisenhower in Defense of Robert E. Lee," August 10, 2014, Mathew W. Lively, https://www.civilwarprofiles.com/dwight-d-eisenhower-in-defense-of-robert-e-lee/, accessed 5-3-20.

^iv Basil L. Gildersleeve, The Creed of the Old South, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1915; reprint: BiblioLife, Penrose Library, University of Denver (no date given), 26-27.

Naming commission epitomizes the degradation of American history

Posted on May 12, 2023May 12, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | No Comments

Naming commission epitomizes the degradation of American history

Its lead historian, Conner Williams of Yale, calls Confederates traitors

King George III called the American Colonists traitors too, so Confederates are in good company

Two articles below obliterate the Confederates as traitors fraud

[Publisher's Note, by Gene Kizer, Jr. - In the secession debate in the South in the year leading up to states seceding, the most widely quoted phrase came from the Declaration of Independence:

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The "Form of Government" destructive of the ends of self-government in the South was the federal government dominated by the Northern majority that had sent terrorists like John Brown into the South to murder, rape and rob Southerners. Ohio and Iowa protected Brown's terrorist sons from extradition to Virginia to stand trial then Northerners celebrated Brown as a hero when brought to justice.

Before that it was Hinton Helper's The Impending Crisis that called for the throats of Southerners to be cut in the night. The Republican Party - the party of the North pledged against the South - as Wendell Phillips proudly proclaimed, printed hundreds of thousands and distributed them coast to coast as a campaign document in 1860.

There was also massive taxation that caused Southerners to pay three-fourths of the country's taxes while three-fourth of the tax money was being spent in the North. Henry L. Benning, for whom Fort Benning, Georgia used to be named, said "Eighty-five millions is the amount of the drains from the South to the North in one year, - drains in return for which the South receives nothing." 1

Benning then predicted the bloody war with precision:

The North cut off from Southern cotton, rice, tobacco, and other Southern products would lose three fourths of her commerce, and a very large proportion of her manufactures. And thus those great fountains of finance would sink very low. . . . Would the North in such a condition as that declare war against the South? 2

That's not something Connor Williams would understand because he is a politicized historian working for a political commission established by the most historically ignorant, virtue signaling, characterless politician in American history, Elizabeth Warren, his fellow New Englander, who claimed she was an Indian for years to game the Affirmation Action system at Harvard when she is as white as the pure driven snow.

The real traitors are traitors to truth and falsifiers of history as exemplified by the naming commission, which knew the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery symbolized the reconciliation of North and South, but deliberately left that out of their report to Congress.

The reconciliation theme is not a "my interpretation of history versus theirs." It is indisputable and was established by Arlington National Cemetery itself - in numerous places and in great detail - in their application for ANC's Historic District to be on the National Register of Historic Places. That application was approved in 2014.

How could reconciliation not be the theme when four presidents - William McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, William Howard Taft and Woodrow Wilson - with veterans North and South, blessed it and enthusiastically participated in its construction and dedication. Another president, Warren G. Harding, sent a message of condolence to the Arlington funeral of the Confederate Monument's famous sculptor, Moses Ezekiel, himself a VMI Confederate soldier.

The year before the Confederate Memorial was dedicated, 1913, was the fiftieth anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg with its famous handshakes across the wall by the old Union and Confederate veterans.

The Confederate Memorial was the brainchild of former Union soldier and later president, William McKinley, who said:

. . . every soldier's grave made during our unfortunate civil war is a tribute to American valor . . . And the time has now come . . . when in the spirit of fraternity we should share in the care of the graves of the Confederate soldiers . . . The cordial feeling now happily existing between the North and South prompts this gracious act and if it needed further justification it is found in the gallant loyalty to the Union and the flag so conspicuously shown in this year just passed by the sons and grandsons of those heroic dead.

But this is what naming commission vice chair Ty Seidule said in his hate screed, Robert E. Lee and Me, on page 162:

Of the thousands of monuments around the country to the Confederacy, the one in Arlington National Cemetery angers me the most. Every year, the commander in chief sends a wreath, ensuring the Confederate monument receives all the prestige of the U.S. government. That's why it riles me so much. . . .

Seidule admits that the Confederate Memorial stands for reconciliation, but if he had put that in the naming commission's report to Congress, it would be obvious that the Confederate Memorial is not in the naming commission's remit, therefore they could not have it destroyed and satiate Seidule's personal hatred.

In Robert E. Lee and Me, Seidule continues on page 162:

I know both political parties and white citizens in the North and South brought the country back together after the tremendous bloodletting and destruction of the Civil War. The posts named for Confederate officers during World War I also served to knit white America back together as it fought a common foe. And it worked, but we must recognize that reconciliation came at a steep and horrifying cost. African Americans paid the price with lynching, Jim Crow segregation, and the loss of the franchise. The price for white reconciliation remains far too high. (Bold emphasis added.)

It is clear, by the public admission of the naming commission's vice chair, that the Confederate Memorial and all the Army bases named for Confederates came about because of the reconciliation of our great country and therefore NONE of them are in the naming commission's remit as is required for the naming commission to have any say about their future.

In other words, the naming commission, based on lies caused by the deliberate omission of historical facts, arguably illegally, stated that the Army bases named for Confederates are in their remit and should be changed, and Moses Ezekiel's world-class 109 year old monument in Arlington National Cemetery should be destroyed.

A law suit should be filed immediately on these grounds.

The Army bases and the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery are not in the naming commission's remit. They do not commemorate the Confederacy. They commemorate the reconciliation of our country and to everybody except Ty Seidule, that is a good thing.

We should make this a fight to remove the horribly damaging Wokeness now in our military that has caused the United States Navy to use a drag queen for recruiting, and blesses men in women's barracks and showers. How out of touch with reality can you get.

Below are two articles annihilating the historical fraud that Confederates are traitors. Confederates are the heroes of American history, heirs to the Founding Fathers, who fought a good fight on constitutional principle then rejoined our country with enthusiasm. That's why 44% of the United States military has historically been recruited in the South.

One of the articles I wrote as a letter-to-the-editor of the Charleston Post and Courier responding to a person who had called the crew of the Confederate submarine H. L. Hunley, traitors. The Hunley was the first submarine in history to sink an enemy ship in combat.

The second is from Lloyd Garnett, recently published on the Abbeville Institute blog as "The 'Confederates Were Traitors' Argument Is Ahistorical."

Following Garnett's piece are several important links to Defend Arlington and the fight to prevent the degradation of Arlington National Cemetery, which would occur if the 109 year old Confederate Reconciliation Memorial is destroyed, leaving over 500 graves in concentric circles around a mangled shaft in our nation's most sacred burial ground.

This will tear the fabric of our nation in such a way that it can never be repaired.]

Obliterate the Sophism that Confederates Were Traitors

Posted on June 30, 2019 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | 7 Comments

Confederate submarine H. L. Hunley, December 6, 1863, on dry land in Charleston for repairs, famous painting by Conrad Wise Chapman.

The following is a letter-to-the-editor of the Charleston, SC Post and Courier September 15, 2018 by Gene Kizer, Jr. defending the crew of the Confederate submarine CSS Hunley against a letter-writer's accusation that they were traitors. It applies to all Confederates. This letter was not published by the Post and Courier but has been published in the Abbeville Institute Blog ("Confederate Soldiers Were Not Traitors," October 3, 2018) and other places.

Dear Editor of the Post and Courier,

A letter writer on September 12, 2018 is adamant that the proposed museum for the Confederate submarine H. L. Hunley should not be incorporated into Patriot's Point because Patriot's Point honors the U.S. Navy and those "who defended the U.S. and its Constitution" whereas the CSS Hunley crew were traitors.

He is correct that the Hunley's sinking of the USS Housatonic to become the first submarine in history to sink an enemy ship in combat was an historic event, but he errs grievously when he says the Hunley should also be remembered "for their pardons for treason." That is fake history.

The Hunley crew gave their lives for their country. They were not charged with treason and nobody associated with the Hunley sought a pardon.

The writer is confused about our country's founding because nowhere in the U.S. Constitution in 1861 did it say the Federal Government had a right or obligation to wage war against any state in the Union for any reason.

The country was not centralized in those days and each state was sovereign and independent and had been since the Colonists won the Revolutionary War. King George III agreed to the Treaty of Paris, September 3, 1783, which stated:

Article 1st. His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz, New-Hampshire, Massachusetts-Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New-York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free, sovereign and independent states . . . .

No state ever rescinded its sovereignty or gave up its independence.

In fact, three states were so protective of their independence that they insisted, before they would join the new Union, that they could secede from it if it became tyrannical in their eyes. Those states were New York, Rhode Island and Virginia. Because all the states were admitted to the Union as equals, the acceptance of the right of secession demanded by New York, Rhode Island and Virginia, gave that right to all the other states.

The right of secession was not questioned during the antebellum era. It was taught in places like the United States Military Academy at West Point in famous texts such as William Rawle's "A View of the Constitution of the United States of America." The New England states with their Hartford Convention almost seceded over the War of 1812, but the Southern boys under Andrew Jackson defeated the British in New Orleans and ended the war. New England threatened secession again with the admission of Texas in 1845. Even Horace Greeley believed in the right of secession ("let the erring sisters go") until he realized the loss of his Southern manufacturing market and cotton threatened to destroy the Northern economy, and along with it, his wealth and power. Then he wanted war.

In the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the Founding Fathers called for the Constitution to be ratified by each state through a special convention of the people to decide that one issue, rather than through their legislatures. If they ratified it through their legislatures, a later legislature might rescind the ratification of an earlier legislature, therefore a convention of the people was a more sound basis for a state to approve the Constitution.

When the Southern States seceded, they followed the exact precedent set by the Founding Fathers in the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Each Southern state called a convention of the people (commonly called a secession convention), elected delegates as Unionists or Secessionists, debated the single issue of whether to stay in the Union or leave, then seven states voted to secede. Four rejected secession for the time being.

When the guns of Fort Sumter sounded, there were more slave states in the Union (eight, soon to be nine) than the Confederacy (seven). Of course, the four that had rejected secession, immediately seceded when Lincoln called for 75,000 volunteers to invade the South because they did not believe the Federal Government had a right to invade a sovereign state or coerce it to do anything.

Secession was their legal right and they did it properly. So, the idea that the crew of the CSS Hunley were traitors, is ludicrous.

I might remind the letter writer that the Hunley crew's ancestors, like all Confederate ancestors, gave our country independence because the Revolutionary War was won in the South.

And the Hunley crew's descendants, being from the South - a region that reveres military service - helped mightily to win every other American war.

Patriot's Point represents the highest ideals of American valor and patriotism, and there is none greater than that exhibited by the crew of the CSS Hunley.

The Hunley museum should not only be at Patriot's Point, it should be the star of Patriot's Point. The Hunley is only part of the story of the Siege of Charleston, which was one of the longest sieges in history. Anyone who has seen some of the hundreds of pictures of Charleston destroyed from the Battery to Calhoun Street by Union shelling from ships such as the USS Housatonic, knows there is a tremendous story here. The Confederate semi-submersible cigar-shaped vessels (Davids) that harassed the Union blockade as well as the ironclads, Palmetto State and Chicora, and blockade runners, are not as well known as the Hunley but just as fascinating. All of this should be told at Patriot's Point.

Patriot's Point could become one of the greatest historical assets on the planet. With Fort Sumter, Fort Moultrie, and the new International African-American Museum coming soon, Charleston could dominate history tourism like nowhere on earth and take us to a level we can't even imagine right now.

Gene Kizer, Jr.
Charleston Athenaeum Press
Charleston, SC

The "Confederates Were Traitors" Argument Is Ahistorical

Published on the Abbeville Institute Blog, May 4, 2023, by Lloyd "Doc" Garnett.

https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/the-confederates-were-traitors-argument-is-ahistorical/

www.AbbevilleInstitute.org

SUPPORTERS OF THE ERASURE & DESTRUCTION COMMISSION, aka Naming Commission, are fond of displaying their ignorance regarding the legal framework of the United States under the Constitution. Never is their misapprehension more evident than when they declare that Confederates were “traitors.”

The charge is so unarguably counterfactual as to be absurd. While forgiveness (not forgetfulness) should be our Christian impulse, it is our duty to our birthright to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” – which is to say, our individual and political sovereignty under God – to firmly set the record straight.

Setting the historical record straight is not a matter of rehashing bygones, which ought to be left as bygones. Rather, understanding the important Constitutional arguments involved then, is critical to grasping the political and social arguments now. As the current arguments by the ignorant and the malevolent have today devolved into riotous violence, injury and destruction of property, iconic art and symbolic reminders of our worthy heritage, it should be obvious that appreciation for the concept of “government by consent of the governed” is at stake.

FIRST, we must start with the plain language and known intent of the Constitution, which was adopted within the living memory of some, and by the parents and grandparents of many, who lived through the events of 1860 -1865.

By that Constitution, the Southern States had, as all states today have, the Right to Withdraw from the Union, to assume/resume the powers they previously delegated to the Federal government, and establish such governmental arrangements as the people of the respective, sovereign States desire. Nowhere in the Constitution is withdrawal by a sovereign State prohibited. This is not an accident or an oversight by the Framers. It is intentional.

#1) The first Founding Document (“The Declaration of Independence”) was approved by all 13 colonies. In it or by it, they each and collectively declared themselves to be free and independent, sovereign States, and asserted their right of secession from Great Britain as fundamental to government by consent.

#2) When the question was posed in the Constitution Convention, whether the proposed United States could prevent a State from leaving the proposed Union, the idea was summarily rejected. James Madison (“The Father of the Constitution”) advised the assembled delegates, that any attempt to assert such control would doom ratification because the States would never assent to prohibiting the very action by which their independence was gained. As the States had so recently fought a very bloody and costly war defeating the most powerful nation on Earth to assert that very right, Madison’s belief is indisputable.

#3) Whereas the Preamble of the preceding Articles of Confederation referred to establishing a “perpetual Union,” the Framers of the new government’s Constitution deliberately deleted the word “perpetual” from the document.

#4) The Bill of Rights, specifically Amendments IX and X clearly must include the right of the people of any State to withdraw from the Union, as it is not otherwise prohibited anywhere in the Constitution… to this day.

#5) Virginia, Rhode Island and New York all reserved the right to withdraw and/or to resume all of the powers delegated to the Federal government as a caveat to their ratification of the Constitution and joining the proposed Union. These three States were accepted by their sister States into the Union with this caveat. As the Constitution specifies that all States must be treated equally, the caveat demanded by Rhode Island, New York and Virginia was thus automatically applicable to ALL of the States.

#6) All of the States ratifying the new Constitution, had to first secede from the previous government under the Articles of Confederation. This they each did independently, with Rhode Island being the last to secede from the first and join the second, in 1790, three years after the first state, Delaware did so. By seceding from Great Britain and again, from the government under the Articles of Confederation, it is manifest that the overarching right of secession was embraced by them all.

#7) It was therefore clearly and universally believed that the sovereign States had the right to withdraw (secede) from the Union. The right of secession was even taught at West Point, using the textbook A View Of the Constitution of the United States by William A. Rawle, who was one of the foremost Constitutional scholars of the day. A native and lifelong resident of Philadelphia, Rawle was personally well acquainted, met and freely corresponded with a number of the Framers.

[Publisher's Note: It seems that the naming commission's Ty Seidule would know this since he was in the history department at West Point for years and retired from there. It would also seem that lead historian, Yale's Connor Williams, would know it too.
Connor Williams SHOULD know a lot about traitors since Yale is in Connecticut and the Hartford Convention of Hartford, Connecticut arguably was the most treasonous affair in American history. Of course they did have the right to secede from the Union but their timing, while the United States was engaged in a bitter war with the British, hurt the American war effort enormously. Patriotic Americans were deeply concerned that Massachusetts, Connecticut and other New England states might join the British.
Fortunately, Andy Jackson and the Southern boys whipped the British at the Battle of New Orleans and won the war for America, which let the Hartford Conventioneers off with just egg, and Benedict Arnold-type embarrassment, on their faces.]

#8) Acting in Convention, the New England States asserted their right and threatened to secede at least 4 times – over the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, the War of 1812 (several New England states effectively “sat out” and did not participate), the War with Mexico and the admission of the Republic of Texas as a sovereign State. No one questioned the New England States’ right to do so.

SECOND: Therefore, having the Right to Secede and to form a new government of their choosing, South Carolina and the six States who first joined her, had the right to defend themselves against a hostile military invasion and naval blockade of South Carolina’s only deep water harbor and most important access to international markets (as well as to resist the massive, violent, overland military invasions that were launched upon them soon after).

“But, but, …” some irrelevantly feel compelled to declare, “the Confederates fired the first shot at Fort Sumter!” Apparently, they hold that by “firing the first shot” a country is guilty of starting a war, regardless of provocation.

By this logic, the United States was guilty of starting the War with Japan! In the early morning of December 7, 1941, before any attack on Pearl Harbor was even anticipated, the U. S. Navy sank a Japanese submarine. This was the first shot fired in America’s war with Japan, and Americans fired it. No one credibly asserts that the U. S. started World War II. The comparative analogy to what occurred 81 years earlier in Charleston Harbor is solid.

As Japan was merely suspected in November/December 1941, of having launched a war fleet possibly against the United States’ interests in the Pacific, the Lincoln government was by contrast, known to have launched a war fleet to reinforce and resupply Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor. By International Law, all countries have sole jurisdiction over their harbors and Charleston Harbor was subject to the jurisdiction of the CSA.

The purpose of Lincoln’s blockading and reinforcing fleet was not to put down a rebellion or insurrection, as he claimed. Rather, the new Confederacy wished only to withdraw and form their own nation, NOT overthrow the USA. So, Lincoln’s actual intent was to defeat the fledgling new nation before it could fully affect its sustainable independence.

The shots fired at Fort Sumter by the Confederates were for the purpose of defending its harbor against further attack and blockade, as they knew additional U.S. warships and reinforcements were on the way. A successful reinforcement of Fort Sumter would close that vital harbor and severely damage Southern independence hopes. And certainly, they reasoned that Lincoln’s military and naval subjugation efforts would not stop with just Charleston Harbor.

Thus, the Confederates having lawfully withdrawn from the Union and formed a new government and nation, according to the desires of the people of the respective sovereign Southern States, opened fire to take possession of Fort Sumter. That action was necessary to assert the new nation’s rights, which are the rights of ALL nations to protect and defend its borders, territory, harbors and access to sea lanes and commercial interests.

When subsequently, Lincoln announced a full scale military invasion of the seven seceded States, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas and Missouri, until then pro-Union, were vehemently appalled by the Constitutional violation of this long accepted right to secede from a hostile government and to govern themselves. Those five States’ popular opinions changed virtually overnight from pro-Union to pro-secession, and they severed their Union bonds to defend their sister Southern States and themselves from illegal and violent coercion. The people of the seceded States believed they had a lawful right and a moral obligation to do so.

From the cornerstones of the Founding as detailed in The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, the building blocks of the Confederates’ intellectual fortress against the defamation of “treason,” is summed up by the following question:

IF the right of government by consent is legitimate (It is!) , and IF it is not prohibited by the Constitution (It’s not!), and IF ALL nations have a right to defend themselves against foreign military and naval aggression (They do!) , and IF the former U.S.A. military, naval and civilian government officials’ previous oaths were to defend the U. S. Constitution and to obey lawful orders, etc. (They were!) , and IF by their resignations, the Southerners concerned were no longer bound by that oath (They weren’t!) … then how could they be guilty of treason?

The answer is that they could not because they were not.

This fact unavoidably came slowly to be understood by the victorious USA’s legal scholars, jurists and eventually, reluctantly, by its politicians soon after the exigencies of warfare had ended and the many questions and challenges of re-establishing governance began to take precedence.

After the Southern armies had surrendered or voluntarily disbanded, CSA President Jefferson Davis was incarcerated by the Yankees for two years with the aim of prosecuting and convicting him of treason and then hanging him.

In attempting to build a case against Davis, however, two successive U.S. attorneys general, and the first two “Independent Counsels” in U.S. history, all independently concluded that Davis and the Confederates could not be justly convicted of treason.

It is believed by many that a majority on the U.S. Supreme Court believed so, as well, and were desperate to avoid ruling on the question. In his seminal The Civil War – A Narrative, Vol. III, pages 1035 -1039, Shelby Foote describes the evolution among Davis’s captors, would be prosecutors and President Johnson’s Cabinet, of the realization that Davis was not guilty of treason. Further, they rightly feared that to subject the question to a trial would result not only in Davis’s acquittal but that his acquittal would support the legality of secession!

Highly respected legal experts, in Washington City and all across the North, including the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Salmon P. Chase, had reluctantly reached this same conclusion. Caught in a legal bind, and thus out on a legal limb all by himself, Federal Justice Underwood, the presiding judge, finally dismissed the charges against Davis, using a convoluted, incoherent argument claiming justification by the newly ratified 14th Amendment, ex post facto.

Thus, by a legalistic pretense, did Justice Underwood save the bloody, deadly, costly military conquest of the Southern people, from being civilly, peacefully reversed in the Court of Law!

FOURTH… but SLAVERY!

In no way, can the issue of slavery be related to the charge of “Traitor,” which is wrongly assigned by mostly ignorant and a few malevolent accusers against the long dead Confederates. Slavery, morally wrong then as now, was nevertheless legal. And if one supported a lawful activity, it could not be grounds for a charge of treason. If one supported lawful slavery as grounds for lawful secession, even that could not be grounds for treason, either.

This part of the argument could be left at the last sentence above (PERIOD). But some, imbued with 158 years of relentless victors’ propaganda to the contrary, might require some supporting context. If so, I will attempt it as briefly as I can.

“In this enlightened age, there are few I believe, but what will acknowledge, that slavery as an institution, is a moral & political evil in any Country” wrote Robert E. Lee, years before the war. He was probably correct about the prevailing opinion, North and even South. However loathe I may be to disagree with Marse Robert, based on my extensive reading, I believe most were amazingly ambivalent.

Here, we should note that a nationwide, orderly, peaceful emancipation of the slaves was never seriously put forth. Some Southerners freed their slaves voluntarily and without compensation. So, some Southerners talked of government sponsored, compensated and gradual emancipation to allow for peaceful and efficient societal adjustment. But Northern interests, having decades before rid themselves of slavery, mostly by selling their slaves via New England slave traders, would not hear of it.

In lieu of peaceful and orderly emancipation, a few Northern “radical abolitionists” actively funded and supported violent abolition, such as John Brown’s infamous, murderous rampages in Kansas and Virginia. Prior to John Brown’s Raid on Harpers Ferry, there were more Emancipation Societies in the South than in the North. But the celebratory Northern reaction to “Bleeding Kansas,” Brown’s murders and the refusal by Northern States to extradite escaped participants and co-conspirators, resulted in a hardening of Southern attitudes. White Southerners, outnumbered in some communities by Blacks, were understandably fearful of bloody revolts and vengeful reprisals such as John Brown’s, Nat Turner’s, Denmark Vesey’s, a half dozen others from New York to Louisiana, and the most “successful” genocidal bloodbath in Haiti. Thus, did the previously growing, general Southern appetite for emancipation begin to dramatically wane.

Without getting too deep into all of the complexities and myriad views of slavery, who profited, the tangled interests, whether and how to end it, etc., suffice to say with respect to the specific charge of treason: Slavery was legal from before the beginning, to after the end of the war.

[Publisher's Note: New York, Boston and other New England cities carried on an illegal slave trade until years after the War Between the States though the slave trade had been outlawed by the U.S. Constitution in 1808. W. E. B. Du Bois said in his famous book, The Suppression of the African Slave-Trade to the United States, that in 1863, during the war, Boston and New York were the largest slave trading ports on the planet.]

When the war was launched by Lincoln to “preserve the Union,” there were seven Confederate States, all of which permitted slavery, and nine Union States that permitted slavery. There were more Union “slave states” than Confederate when the war was started. Four “slave states” joined the Confederacy upon Lincoln’s announcement of war to prevent secession. Five “slave states” remained in the Union. Later, a sixth “slave state,” West Virginia, would secede from the Confederacy and join/re-join the Union.

Slavery would not become illegal in the United States until the ratification of the 13th Amendment, which occurred AFTER the war was over. Ironically, the first state to ratify the Constitution, Delaware, which remained in the Union throughout the war, was the last state to end slavery after ratification of the 13th Amendment.

So if support of lawful slavery were somehow tantamount to the crime of treason, the slaveholding Union States of New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri (Claimed by both the Union and the Confederacy), and later, in West Virginia (admitted to the Union during the war as a “slave state”) … and in the slave holding territories of Oklahoma and New Mexico, would have suffered no end of prominent gallows.

At no time, did Lincoln or the Republican Congress declare that ending slavery was an objective of the war. In fact, Lincoln specifically, adamantly said the opposite many times. In fact, Lincoln even said in his first inaugural address that he supported adoption of an Amendment to the Constitution, which would ensure that slavery would be perpetually allowed by the Constitution. Known as the “Corwin Amendment,” it was passed by the Republican Congress and ratified by five Union states including Lincoln's Illinois until the war made it moot.

The Republican Congress’s official “War Aims Resolution” did not even mention slavery, much less declare abolition as an objective.

As for the much vaunted and ballyhooed “Emancipation Proclamation,” only those who haven’t carefully read and analyzed it fantasize that it freed a single slave anywhere.

To put the bizarre allegations of the “slavery = treason” connection away: When the war was started to prevent Southern independence, there more slave states in the USA than in the CSA. The Emancipation Proclamation did not free the slaves, and West Virginia was admitted to the Union as a “slave state” during the war after the Emancipation Proclamation was published. Slavery remained legal in the Union until after the war. Lincoln specifically stated ending slavery was not an objective of the war. And the Republican led U. S. Congress formally omitted any mention that the abolition of slavery was a war aim.

The charge of “treason” against the Confederates is refuted by facts and logic. Neither secession, which was lawful, nor the institution of slavery, which was also lawful, constituted rebellion, insurrection or treason by the lawful authority of the governing U. S. Constitution.

We should not stand quietly by as “know nothings” distort our history, defame our ancestors and mischaracterize the essence of government by consent of the governed. Grave harm will fall upon succeeding generations of Americans regardless of ancestry, if we do.

PLEASE NOTE: This began as an informal email conversation among friends, a couple of whom asked me to clean it up for submission to the esteemed Abbeville Institute. All unassailable facts and logic, I have merely remembered from the works of many great historians, patriots and thinkers. As I’ve been reading about the events in question for over 60 years, I wish to express my debt and gratitude to far more people than is possible. However, among those still with us who continue to contribute their hard work, research, clear thinking and inspiration, I sincerely thank Clyde Wilson, H. V. (Bo) Traywick, Jr., Philip Leigh, Samuel Mitcham, Jr., Boyd Cathey, Thomas DiLorenzo, Gene Kizer, Jr., James and Walter Kennedy and the indefatigable Ann McClean… along with a regiment of like minded friends and family too numerous to list by name.

Lloyd Garnett

Lloyd Garnett is a retired “jack of several trades,” avid reader, observer and a Virginian.

Links to Important Resources

Shop Now

View testimony which starts at 1:38:59.

Here is a link to Defend Arlington's donation page that states:

CHIP IN FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY MEMORIAL LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND. You can also pay with Zelle. Send to DefendArlington@gmail.com.

Please Donate Now -- THANK YOU!

Click Here to Donate AND Share on Facebook, et al.

Defend Arlington update with link to February 28, 2023 Tucker Carlson interview with Christopher Bedford on the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington update, Tucker Carlson segment on YouTube

Defend Arlington's 385 Page Book of White Papers

Here is a link to an informative nine minute video, "The Arlington Confederate Monument," produced by the Abbeville Institute.

The Arlington Confederate Monument

PDF White Papers from Defend Arlington

Click Here for Bode Lang's excellent video

Here is a link to an excellent video of a Georgia lady calling out Elizabeth Warren and her Massachusetts hypocrisy.

Click Here for Georgia Lady Teaching Elizabeth Warren a Lesson

Here are important Southern Legal Resource Center links. SLRC mailing address is: Southern Legal Resource Center, 90 Church St., Black Mountain, NC 28711-3365.

Click Here to donate to the Southern Legal Resource Center

Click Here to follow on Facebook

Click Here to go to their website

Take action TODAY!

1 Henry L. Benning, "Henry L. Benning's Secessionist Speech, Monday Evening, November 19," delivered in Milledgeville, Georgia, November 19, 1860, in Freehling and Simpson, Secession Debated, Georgia's Showdown in 1860, 132.

2 Ibid.

Professor Edward C. Smith, Rest in Peace

Posted on April 12, 2023April 12, 2023 by Gene Kizer, Jr. | No Comments

Professor Edward C. Smith

Distinguished Scholar and Preeminent Expert on Black Confederates Passes March 11, 2023

He was a warm, extremely witty, engaging speaker

Rest in Peace, Brother Ed

Beloved Professor Edward C. Smith, from Washington Post Obituary April 9, 2023.

[Publisher's Note, by Gene Kizer, Jr. - I was deeply saddened to hear of the passing of Professor Edward C. Smith of Washington, D.C. in March. He was a beloved friend of many in the Sons of Confederate Veterans and when he spoke at the SCV National Reunion in Lexington, Kentucky August 12, 1993, he was introduced with thunderous applause as "Professor Ed Smith, black Confederate."

He taught at American University for 45 years becoming the first tenured African-American professor at AU, and he co-founded American University's Civil War Institute.

At the 1993 Reunion, Professor Smith said that blacks fought enthusiastically for the South in the War Between the States for the same reason they fought for the Colonists in the Revolutionary War, which he called "the first Confederacy." It was about defending home and family, same as for whites. Remember, Crispus Attucks was the first man killed in the American Revolution and he was of African and Indian descent.

In his talk, Professor Smith pointed out that most abolitionists were not pro-black, they were anti-black and wanted to get rid of blacks. They didn't want blacks anywhere near them, especially in the West. Even Lincoln did not believe blacks and whites could live together. He wanted to send blacks back to Africa or into a place they could survive. See Colonization After Emancipation, Lincoln and the Movement for Black Resettlement (Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 2011) by Phillip W. Magness and Sebastian N. Page.

Smith was indignant at the politicized fraud that often passes for history in this now-Woke age.

He discussed slavery and how it was dying out and likely would not have lasted another generation. There were already over 500,000 free blacks in the country, some 260,000 in the South, more than in the North. There were 60,000 free blacks in Virginia alone.

He talked about the social intimacy that exists today and back then in the South between blacks and whites, which could never exist in the North or West. The South was a multi-cultural, mostly integrated, bi-racial society as opposed to the North that was overwhelmingly white. Five Northern states had laws that forbid blacks from even visiting much less living there including Lincoln's Illinois. Jim Crow laws started in the North and were there a long time before moving South according to C. Vann Woodward in his famous work, The Strange Career of Jim Crow.

Professor Smith said there is overwhelming proof that black Southerners marched alongside white Southerners as soldiers in Confederate armies, not segregated and in the back of the line as they were in the Union Army.

Smith mentions one prominent Yankee observer, Dr. Lewis H. Steiner, Inspector of the United States Sanitary Commission, who observed the exit of Stonewall Jackson's army from Frederick, Maryland in 1862:

Wednesday, September 10, 1862: At 4 o'clock this morning the Rebel army began to move from our town, Jackson's force taking the advance. The movement continued until 8 o'clock P.M., occupying 16 hours. The most liberal calculation could not give them more than 64,000 men. Over 3,000 Negroes must be included in the number. They had arms, rifles, muskets, sabers, bowie-knives, dirks, etc. They were supplied, in many instances, with knapsacks, haversacks, canteens, etc., and they were manifestly an integral portion of the Southern Confederacy army. They were seen riding on horses and mules, driving wagons, riding on caissons, in ambulances, with the staff of generals and promiscuously mixed up with all the Rebel horde.

There could have been many more blacks than 3,000 since Dr. Steiner began observing at 4:00 a.m., before light, and could have missed many light-skinned blacks.

Professor Smith spoke of black loyalty on the home front where there were wholesale avenues of escape throughout the war. He pointed out that most blacks stayed home and ran the economy and protected women and children whose husbands were off on distant battlefields.

Smith maintains that blacks had it within their power to make the War Between the States a "four-week war" had they chosen to side with the invading Yankees and sabotage, poison, rape and pillage, but of course they did not. They were steadfast in their loyalty to the South, which enabled the War Between the States to be a bloody four-year contest with 750,000 deaths and over a million maimed that ended only after the South was utterly exhausted of manpower, and largely destroyed.

Contrast that with the Yankee army that was 25% foreign, many of whom had come here with only the shirts on their backs, signing up to get clothes and Union Army enlistment bounties.

Professor Smith's long, loud standing ovation at the end was heartfelt and well-deserved.

We have the DVD set on our website. Here is a YouTube link to part of that great talk:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2S62SoN-sI&t=401s

Professor Smith's Funeral Mass will be April 17, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle in Washington, DC.

Below is his complete obituary (Click Here to read online) followed by links to the Defend Arlington campaign to save the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.]

Edward C. Smith

On March 11, 2023, Professor Edward C. Smith peacefully passed away. Smith, a third-generation Washingtonian, was 80 years old.

His professional academic career began in 1969 when he co-founded The Heights School, and he taught there until the 1970s. Almost simultaneously, he began teaching at American University from 1969 -2014. While at AU, Smith became the first African-American educator to earn a tenured professorship, and he was a co-founder of American University's Civil War Institute.

From 1976-1978, Smith took a sabbatical from AU and worked at the White House in the Carter Administration. He was deputy speech writer for presidential assistant Midge Costanza. In 1997, in collaboration with two Catholic Study Centers, he co-founded the Youth Leadership Foundation. Since 1997, the organization has supported character development in more than 4,000 students in the DMV.

Smith's words, humor, and insights will be missed by family, friends, and former students. He is survived by his children Todd, Dawn, Christopher, Austin, and SGT Chad, as well as his grandson Coby. Predeceased by the late SSG. Justin.

On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 10 a.m., his funeral mass will be held at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle located at 1725 Rhode Island Ave. NW, Washington, DC. Immediately following, the interment ceremony will take place at Washington National Cemetery in Hillcrest Heights, Maryland, where Professor Smith will be buried with his late wife Mary Magdalene Jefferson Smith and near his late mother Rachel Willis.

(Obituary Published by The Washington Post on Apr. 9, 2023.)

Links to Important Resources

Shop Now

View testimony which starts at 1:38:59.

Here is a link to Defend Arlington's donation page that states:

CHIP IN FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY MEMORIAL LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND. You can also pay with Zelle. Send to DefendArlington@gmail.com.

Please Donate Now -- THANK YOU!

Click Here to Donate AND Share on Facebook, et al.

Defend Arlington update with link to February 28, 2023 Tucker Carlson interview with Christopher Bedford on the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington update, Tucker Carlson segment on YouTube

ere is a link to the new 385 page PDF from Defend Arlington that flips pages as you read. It contains all the great scholarly white papers gathered up by Defend Arlington to make sure that Woke ignorance DIES at Arlington National Cemetery.

Defend Arlington's 385 Page Book of White Papers

Here is a link to an informative nine minute video, "The Arlington Confederate Monument," produced by the Abbeville Institute.

The Arlington Confederate Monument

PDF White Papers from Defend Arlington

Click Here for Bode Lang's excellent video

Here is a link to an excellent video of a Georgia lady calling out Elizabeth Warren and her Massachusetts hypocrisy.

Click Here for Georgia Lady Teaching Elizabeth Warren a Lesson

Here are important Southern Legal Resource Center links. SLRC mailing address is: Southern Legal Resource Center, 90 Church St., Black Mountain, NC 28711-3365.

Click Here to donate to the Southern Legal Resource Center

Click Here to follow on Facebook

Click Here to go to their website